Villain

Johnny Bear’s Representation as a Protagonist, Criminal and Victim

December 9, 2020 by Essay Writer

Johnny Bear

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life thinking that it is stupid.” It takes someone with a talent to completely imitate other people including their voices. In this world there is no such thing as a villain, hero or victim. When we look at Johnny Bear’s situation from different perspectives, he is a hero, villain and a victim as well.

A villain is not always a bad person because sometimes it is the villain who becomes the hero. In nature I don’t think that anybody likes to kill just for fun, but for the sake of somebody they truly love they would do anything for that person. If we take the enemies we fight against in the battlefield as example, we know that to us they are enemies and villains. If we even dare to put ourselves in the shoes of at least one of the enemies whom we fight against, some of them kissed their children ‘goodbye’ telling them that they were going to go fight for their future freedom knowing that they would never see them again and that they would have to risk their lives in the battlefield for the sake for their children. The people whom we think are villains then turn out to be the ones who fought to save the generation of their children. Amy might look at Johnny Bear as a villain because he would ruin her reputation, but I doubt that the person she had sex with thinks the same way.

For Johnny Bear imitating conversations was a way for him to make money because the people would just sit there and drink whiskey while he imitates and engage in different conversations. He was helping spread the truth, and at that time the civil rights of the Asians were not respected; rather they were treated as immigrants. I think that every person is a human being whether he or she is Mongoloid, Negroid or Caucasoid. Everybody can be a hero, but not everybody is a hero. If a person is lying on a sidewalk, everybody is walking by, but when one person steps to help others then start to help. I would say that that person is the hero.

If we looked at Johnny Bear’s situation from his perspective, he benefited from sharing people’s conversation because the more he shares things which people don’t want to hear the more he is going to get customers. If he continues doing what he does, then people would just listen to him because their reputation might be ruined by what he said. In the story we see that he would get smacked in the head to stop him from talking because he does not care about what type of situation he would be in if he copied people’s conversations.

The people who are at the top with power live a luxurious life compared to the people at the bottom. Once a person experiences such life where he or she can get anything he or she wants, then that person would then want to be at that place and would do a lot of things to stay there. Johnny Bear was an idiot because he did not think to calculate the risks of giving out information which would ruin someone’s reputation. In conclusion, Johnny bear being a villain, victim or a hero depends on the perspective of the person involved but from my point of view I think that even though he can imitate people along with their conversation and voice, I don’t think he has empathy for other people and that has him in trouble.

Read more

Understanding Rudyard Kipling’s Portrayal of Rikki-Tikki as an Antihero Based on His Wickedness as Depicted in His Short Story, Rikki-Tikki-Tavi

December 9, 2020 by Essay Writer

Hero or Villain?

Hero or villain? that is the question when considering the mongoose character in Rudyard kipling’s short story “Rikki-tikki-tavi.” In the story, Rikki-tikki the mongoose takes great measures to protect his human family from the fatal attacks of a king cobra family. Rikki is first introduced as the main character who fought “ single handed” in “great war”, (22). In addition, kipling concludes the telling of the story with the following statement, “Rikki-tikki had a right to be proud of himself, but he didn’t grow too proud…” (34) While Rikki protected his family honorably against the cobras, he should not be proud of his actions due to the fact that he was merciless in his dealings, and he even gloried in his killings.

Rikki’s actions reveal a heart that is merciless and cruel. First of all, Rikki shows no hesitation in killing all the baby snakes that were yet to be born. “ He bit off the tops of the eggs as fast as he could, taking care to crush the young cobras…at least there were only three eggs left, and Rikki-tikki began to chuckle to himself,”(30). Although Rikki may have deemed it a necessary evil to kill the snake eggs in order to protect his human family, his chuckle conveys a twisted enjoyment of this mission that leaves his character in question. When Nagaina learns from Rikki-tikki that all but one of her eggs are destroyed by Rikki-tikki, she pleads with rikki-tikki to let her take the one egg and promises to leave and never return again. Rikki tikki refuses. “Yes, you will go away, and you will never come back; for you will go to the rubbish heap with nag. fight widow…”(31) perhaps rikki tikki doubts her sincerity, but he gives this plea not even a second of consideration. In light of these events, rikki’s strength seem to lie in heartlessness and cruelty.

Rikki-tikki killed the cobras who just wanted to get a good home for their family, moreover, gloried in his killings. “Quick Chuchundra or I’ll bite you.” (27) It shows that Rikki-tikki can be friendly only with the creatures who are on his side. Even not with the characters who are neutral. And obviously not with his enemies. Also he doesn’t feel sorry for not resolving a problem without or at least in less amount of deaths. He didn’t even try to move the snakes. Rikki-tikki didn’t either listen to Nagaina when she asked him to let her leave to save her and baby’s lives. Then, maybe he wanted to kill as many of his enemies as he could. Or kill anyone who is going to give him a reason. ”The boy is safe, and it was I – I – I that caught Nag by the hood last night in the bathroom.’ Then he began to jump up and down, all four feet together, his head close to the floor. “He threw me to and fro, but he could not shake me off. He was dead before the big man blew him in two. I did it! (31) This all leads to the conclusion that Rikki-tikki enjoyed killing others and wanted everyone to recognize him for it. Maybe he wanted to let others know that he dominate in this garden, and you better don’t argue with him, or you’re going to go the same road as Nag and Nagaina.

In conclusion, Rikki-tikki has more reason to be ashamed of himself rather than to be proud. He was merciless in his dealings with the snake eggs, and he was merciless in not allowing Nagaina to go away with her last egg, the only family she had left. To Rikki-tikki, his killings also meant more to him than just the safety of his family. His killings yield for him personal satisfaction, arrogance, and even glory. Although Rikki may be proud of himself for protecting his family from the cobras, Rikki-tikki’s drive for bloodshed and violence extends beyond the noble cause of defending those whom he loves and enters into a darker realm of self gratification. Rikki-tikki cannot be heralded as a “hero.” “Villain” may well be more like it.

Read more

An Analysis of Oscar Wilde’s And Sarah Water’s Demonstration of Victims and Criminals as Shown in the Picture of Dorian and the Little Stranger

December 9, 2020 by Essay Writer

How do your chosen authors explore Victims and Villains?

Within the supernatural victims and villains will most likely appear as main plot devices. Throughout The picture of Dorian Gray many fall to his charm and beauty then paying the price with their death for example the enamoured Sibyl Vane who commits suicide at the apparent thought of being rejected by Gray. Faraday in The Little Stanger also has an effect on the Ayres family as he brings an unknown presence into the house which results in the destruction of the family. In spite of individuals playing a part there are other themes in which villains and victims are conveyed such as class as shown in the futile death of James Vane or the inability to adapt to the changing times for Mrs. Ayers. Both Water and Wilde have villains and victims as its trope of the genre but also conveys their ideas about the times.

One way in which the texts present villains and victims is through the theme of class. In a post war era The Little Stranger takes place in a time where social mobility was increasing and the rich, affluent families were beginning to die off. The way Waters shows that the Ayres’ are a victim of this change as in the opening chapter on Empire day the house was resplendent as Faraday explored the “marble- floored passages” filled with “marvellous” things. This shows they used to possess great wealth and have substance with their name . The contrast in aesthetics thirty odd years later when Faraday next visits sees the previous opulence replaced with “signs of decay” shows the effect changing ideas in class system and the war itself have on the affluent families of the time as they lost out financially. The crumbling house could hence be seen as a microcosm for the diminishing families and the people within them. Throughout the novel the Ayres’ can never get enough money together because they don’t know how to make money as before it had been handed to them on the silver spoon when they were born. Most notably Mrs. Ayres who’s in ability to adapt to the times leaves her behind in her time where her family flourished. Waters has inverted the usual trope of the vilified upper class but instead making them the victims which is a supernatural feature as the reader is most likely not used to sympathising for the well to do elite of British society.

In comparison Wilde presents the working class as victims in The picture of Dorian Gray as shown by James Vane. When the bereaved sailor tries to avenge his sister he is killed by “unfortunate accident”. If he had killed Dorian it would have signalled a class triumph but alas the futility of his death reflects how no matter how hard James Vane tried the upper classes will always come out on top. This was a common theme in the writing of the time with such novels such as Bram Stokers Dracula which is essentially the upper class count preying on the witless lower classes. There is little emotive language or pathos in light of dead man as Dorian replies “listlessly” and is “bored” the only reason he takes interest is because James Vane was a threat to him sowing that in the end the upper classes are only interested in themselves. It can also be stated that Sibyl Vane is also a victim of class as they only way she could hope to ever leave the circumstances she was in hinged on marrying a rich man, like Dorian. Working Class actresses was a very lowly job and often coerced with prostitution to make extra money for the owner of the theatre never mind the girl herself. A girl this low in class could never hope to be free from her social trap hence why the nickname “prince charming” is so apt for Dorian as the prince saves the princess from distress to a live of prosperity. The sheer notion that this is possible means for Sibyl Dorian rules “life for us now” indicating the scale at which a plaything of the rich can affect a life like this. Therefore, her suicide is not just the doing of the individual Dorian himself but also the consequences in terms of class as Sibyl surely could not hope to find another suitor as lavish as Dorian with as many doors to new opportunities.

Another way in which villains and victims are presented is the role of influence. Lord Henry plays a significant role in the character development of Dorian as he introduces him to the ideas of hedonism and that he should “give form to every feeling, expression” in his “low musical voice” which ensnares Dorian. Wilde deliberately using the term “musical” to make the readers imagine what pleasant voice Henry must have had thus lulling them in the same way Dorian was. Hence everyone is being put into Dorian shoes making Henry’s words stand out even more. Henry knows that Dorian is an impressionable young man with a lot of money and this shown in the way Dorian “swings” on his chair. This all-taking place in the garden, this could be an allegory to Genesis as Henry represents the snake and entices Dorian to take a bite of the proverbial apple. This also fits into the philosophy of the Dionysian as Henry wants to live a life of degradation and frenzy compared to the apollonian Basil who symbolises order and normality to Dorian. It is Henry who gives him the yellow book which enthrals Dorian so much so he gets them in many different colours or the fact that Henry found “exquisite pleasure” in playing with Dorian even going as far as to describe him as a “experiment”. This shows Henry to be self-interested and perhaps the most villainous character in the novel as sets Dorian on the path of chaos.

Influence is also seen in The Little Stranger in order to present villains and victims through character much like the dynamic Lord Henry. Faraday could be interpreted as a villain of storytelling and the reader the victim. The whole story is from his perspective and the way he is very hazy over various subjects lends to the ambiguity of the story such as right from the start by saying the house was “blurred and uncertain”. This is called an omniscient narrator and fits in very well with gothic literature because a reader puts their whole trust in the narrator when telling the events that occur but what those events appear untrustworthy or peculiar it would give that sense of unease of what’s real and isn’t. Reality is something Faraday seems to manipulate when he feels “out of time and out of place” as in his mind eye he travels to Hundreds Hall and the reader is left pondering is he really travelling there or is it merely a vivid dream. Waters accentuates this liminality by using phrases such as “I see myself cross the silvered landscape and pass like smoke” the adjective “silvered” creating this unnatural colouring to nature jilting reality. Furthermore, the simile “like smoke” evaporates Faraday into some ethereal being contradicting his previous beliefs that nothing supernatural could be going on it was all down to science. This events occurring on the night of Caroline’s death make it all seem to suspect to the reader, as it could be an attempt by the villainous Faraday to lead a path away from the true events and get trust from the reader just how he got eventually got trust from the Ayres’ family. Faraday wishes to lead the reader astray just like how Lord Henry led Dorian Gray onto the path f Hedonism in order to achieve his desires with little regard for anything else.

In conclusion, victims and villains is a theme explored by both novels for an effect. Dorian Gray exposes the predatory nature of the upper classes on the lower classes and the irony in the empty philanthropy discussed in chapter 3. Wilde wants to satire this society who claim to be so generous to the poor when in actual fact they are only self interested. This is switched on its head in The Little Stranger as she victimises the falling apart gentry and the toll time had including the Second World War. Everyone, even the reader themselves are susceptible to being influenced by other and this truth is realised by the two writers who had two heavy influencers to lead the story in various directions all in the aim to achieve a goal in which they may stop at nothing.

Read more
Order Creative Sample Now
Choose type of discipline
Choose academic level
  • High school
  • College
  • University
  • Masters
  • PhD
Deadline

Page count
1 pages
$ 10

Price