Hillary Clinton

How Media Present Hillary Clinton

October 21, 2021 by Essay Writer

For many years, there always have been stereotypes when it comes to roles in society and its different professions. For instance, the field of politics have been mostly taken by men. Mainly, because women were always expected to take over domestic and family-oriented roles in society unlike men whose fields and professions was a wider realm when compared to women’s. After many studies, results indicated that there are four categories of the representation of women in politics throughout history. According to Anne Phillips, the first category is fudging the footnotes which basically means that many of the attitudes, behaviors, language, and data regarding the representation of women in politics is false. The second category is the assumption of male dominance which revolves around the fact that politics as a field is dominated by men (24). Additionally, the third category is the acceptance of masculinity as an ideal political behavior; which revolves around the unexplained conception that masculinity serves as the ideal behavior and value in the field of politics. The fourth and last category is the commitment to the eternal feminine; which means that the feminine behavior is ideal when performed in the limits of being a wife and a mother and thus would serve as a weak political figure when compared to her colleagues of men (25). These conceptions only show the injustice women face in trying to be part of certain professions within society. However, these misconceptions have changed in the past years as many female political figures made it to high political positions and proved great success and accomplishments to the field of politics.

One of these women figures is Hillary Clinton whom this paper will discuss her representation in the world of politics and media in the modern world where women are striving to prove success in men-dominant fields. Hillary Clinton can be considered one of the most determined female figures that strived for a place among men in the white house. According to her biography, she had a long journey that consisted of her being strong-minded and persistent. Clinton graduated from law school, became the first lady of Arkansas,and she is the first lady when husband Bill Clinton became president of the United States. During that period, Clinton advocated gender equality, and health care reform. Clinton did not only settle for that however; she became senate in 2001 and from there she started her presidential campaign in 2008 and 2016. During her presidential campaigns, Hillary had a unique way of representing herself. According to Martina Topic and Etajha Gilmer, she represented herself initially with a refusal to fit into the role of being a supportive wife only. Taking in consideration her experiences with law and politics, Clinton saw that she was more than just a wife, and a mother. Moreover, Topic and Gilmer address the fact that Clinton used feminist views to portray her ideology and mission objectives. Some of these objectives include her advocating for racial, women, and LGBT freedom and rights. Also, she was raising awareness during her campaign towards raising wages and ensuring and equal pay for women (2533). In a sense, Clinton was representing herself as a woman whose fighting and advocating for the rights of minorities that are often have been neglected and ignored as well as she made this ideology her main element of representativeness to the people, the media, and the world.

The way Hillary Clinton presented herself is completely different from how the media presented her. Unfortunately, Media do not present her in the same positive manner. According to Diana Carlin and Kelly Winfrey, women candidates like Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin were living examples of how women politicians have made a long way in the field. However, they did not escape the sexism towards women in aspects like language and media framing. There was a negative coverage of both women candidates for merely being women (326). This only shows how the media attacked women candidates for being women who are striving for a higher position that have always been dominated by men. Their language and how they spoke was being criticized. The beauty standards, fashion, and their gestures were being criticized as well. It is almost as if to be a woman in that field, every move and every detail will count and would either make or break their image. This is proof of the pressure that women have to go through for striving to be more. Additionally, the media did not only criticize Hillary Clinton’s language and fashion but also used cartoons to diss her image. According to Charlotte Templin, the sexism in cartoons has been used as a tool to show a backlash against professional women for instance, like Hillary Clinton. The cartoons demonstrated clichés and stereotypes against women in aspects like gender reversal, calling her a radical feminist, domestic imagery, women as a body only, cherchez la femme, and many other ways to backlash women and their abilities of being professional and of high standards (30). This only shows a proof of how media can be used a weapon to represent women in the worst stereotypes like making her an object, a body, limited to domestic activities, and basically unreliable for the job.

In conclusion, the way women are represented and attacked in media is unquestionably still happening until this very day. Women are viewed as secondary to men, and the inequality they have been experiencing is being fought by a lot of women like Hillary Clinton. Clinton strived to be known and successful in a field that was dominated by men for so many years, and she addressed other women, and other minorities of races and sexual orientations to represent her ideology. That every individual should be equal to the other and every individual is able to offer something. Mainly, she showed that women are in fact able to offer just as much as men can.

Works Cited

  • Carlin, Diana., Winfrey, Kelly. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah
  • Palin, and the Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage” Journal of Communication Studies, vol. 60, no. 4, 2009, pp: 326-343.
  • Caroli, Betty Boyd. “Hillary Clinton.” Encyclopedia Britannica, Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 24 April 2019, www.britannica.com/biography/Hillary-Clinton.
  • Phillips, Anne, ed. Feminism and politics. Oxford University Press on Demand, 1998.
  • Templin, Charlotte. “Hillary Clinton as Threat to Gender Norms: Cartoon Images of the First Lady.” Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 23, no. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 20–36.
  • Topic, Martina., Gilmer, Etajha. “Hillary Clinton and the Media: From Expected Roles to the Critique of Feminism” The Qualitive Report, vol. 22, no. 10, 2017, pp: 2533-2543.
Read more

The Propaganda of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton During 2016 Election Campaign

October 21, 2021 by Essay Writer

In every four years, citizens of United States of America choose their president by presidential election. Each party selects one candidate to become the president. This is a ten-month-long process in which the candidates create their own campaign. In 2016, Donald Trump ran for president as a Republican candidate and Hillary Clinton ran for president as Democrat candidate. They both started an election campaign in order to gain votes from all around of United States. In order to do so, they both followed similar propagandas such as videos, twitter, and website. Even though both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton followed similar propaganda sources, their use of media and the messages they delivered were different; Donald Trump focuses on fears by blaming specific ethnic groups, Hillary focuses on reliance and safety.

Videos can highly impact its viewers. They appeal to emotions and make viewers think. So, in order to gain attention and supporters both party’s candidates created video ads for their campaign. They both put the ideas they believed in their videos and send messages to its viewers. Through his campaign, Donald Trump was mostly focused on immigrants and minorities of America. Trump and his followers believe that immigrants use resources and damage the economy while bringing crime and violence (Balie). The immigrants can be from any ethnic but he specifically targeted Mexicans and Muslims. In his campaign, Donald Trump shared a tv ad which directly focuses on Muslims in America. In the ad, the first scene is a shot of Obama and Hillary Clinton. A battleship launches a cruise missile strike which goes to the border of USA and Mexico. In the border, there are terrorist attacks. A narrator starts to talk in the background who mentions that Trump will shut down of Muslims entering the United States. The narrator continues to speak by saying Trump will cut off the head ISIS and stop illegal immigration by building a wall. (Rucker) Firstly, this ad blames Muslims for all of the terror attacks which is one of the main and the biggest concerns of Americans. By showing the border of Mexico and America, not only he blames Muslims but also he blames Mexicans too. As a solution to the terrorism, the video offers to deport all of them. Even though it’s the immigrants who got blamed mainly by Donald Trump, the video also targets his opponent Hillary Clinton and former president Barack Obama. The video gives a message that they are aware of the terror attacks but they have done nothing and plan on doing nothing to stop terrorism. In this ad, it can be clearly seen that Donald Trump uses a propaganda in which he offers an explaining to the problems that worries and concerns American citizens by mentioning that these problems have simpler solutions. The solution lays on the other groups which he believes are malevolent towards America and its citizens. He suggests the solution for these kinds of problems is to choose him for president. He guarantees to find the solution for the problem by eliminating the groups. Conversely, Hillary Clinton focused on human rights of all American citizens regardless of their ethnicity. Hillary has used Humayun Jhan who is an American soldier that was Muslim. Humayun Jhan died in Iraq while protecting the United States of America. In one of her video ads. Khizr Khan, Humayun’s father, talks about his son’s story and the sacrifices he has made for the country. In the ad, Khan walks around his house and look at his son’s photos and medals. In the end, Khan asks trump if Humayun was alive, would he have a place in Trump’s America.(Cillizza)The ad specifically reminds us that real people would be affected by Trump’s plans for the country. It gives the idea to that the result of the election is important to people. It connects Trump’s thoughts and comments towards Muslims with the real pain suffered by Muslims. Hillary Clinton released another ad which is focused on girls. The ad contains a diverse group of girls. In the ad, girls are staring at the mirror and evaluating themselves while trump’s voice appears in the background. The ad wants to remind viewers that Trump has commented ugly things towards women over the years and has no respect towards women and he has made comments which can highly affect the younger generation of girls. He has called women ‘’pigs, dogs and disgusting animals’’ for instance. The ad shows how Trump can affect the girls in the society leading them to feel bad about themselves. The ad wants to ask the question ‘’is Donald Trump the president we want for our daughters?’’ (Merica). The video shows not only women but especially girls will be badly affected by Trump’s presidency. The message it gives to its viewers can be clearly seen: the president of America should encourage and cherish young girls, not insult them and damage their self-esteem. Especially for young girls who actually need support from their elders, The video questions Donald Trump’s language and respect towards women. If their president makes them feel like they are not enough, there is a low chance for these girls to believe in theirselves. No parent would want someone to insult their daughter, so why they are letting someone who insults their daughter to be their president?

Social media is a crucial way to communicate in the 21st century. Most of teens and adults only use social media in order to gain and give information. Politicians are also using social media in order to gain attention and votes. Both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton had exponential growth in their followers in their social media accounts during their election propaganda. The opponents both used Twitter and Facebook actively. Firstly, to start with Twitter, since his tweets have been retweeted a

total of 12 million times – twice as many as Clinton’s, Donald Trump seems to outperform Hillary Clinton on Twitter. (Matthias) Donald Trump is an active Twitter user. He dragged a lot of media and attention by his tweets. Not just American citizens but also everyone around the world follows Donald Trump on Twitter. Through his campaign he used Twitter for call fake news and have feuds. One of Donald Trump’s use of Twitter is to call fake news. He has tweeted to inform his followers that News outlets such as CNN, New York Times and Washington Post published fake news about him. The fake news topic includes Russia investigation, nuclear weapons, and conversations with world leaders. The purpose of the fake news related tweets was to deny the news which can affect Trump’s campaign negatively. However, Trump’s tweets were mostly childish and entertaining rather than political. He continuously insulted and attacked a big list of people on twitter. This list includes politicians, celebrities, and other citizens. He specifically attacked Hillary Clinton in election time. For example, he has tweeted ‘’Obama just endorsed Crooked Hillary. He wants four more years of Obama — but nobody else does!’’ (Trump) which directly insults former President Obama and his opponent Hillary Clinton. Donald Trump’s another tweet was on Hillary Clinton’s email controversy and Melania Trump’s speech which gained a lot of attention from media ‘’The media is spending more time doing a forensic analysis of Melania’s speech than the FBI spent on Hillary’s emails.’’ (Trump). The Melania Trump’s speech received negative comments and criticism which affected Donald Trump’s campaign. In this tweet, Trump tries to shift the focus from his wife Melania Trump’s speech to Hillary Clinton’s email controversy. From these tweets, it can be easily seen that the main purpose of Donald Trump is to draw negative comments towards Hillary Clinton in order to make her look bad. While his tweets didn’t directly send a message, the attention he gained from them shows that Twitter has a huge impact on Donald Trump’s propaganda. On the contrary, Hillary Clinton used Twitter for more political reasons. Clinton’s posts are mainly about her campaign and are usually created by her social media team. Hillary Clinton’s tweets have a less personal touch than Trump’s. The tweets are more focused on the aim and show eager for the campaign. She has a social media team of 100 people. The social media tweets from the voice of Hillary. The tweets are direct and straightforward. However, there has been a few times Hillary and her team responded to Donald Trump. Hillary responded the tweet about Obama and Clinton mentioned above by tweeting ‘’Delete your Account’’. The media team mentioned that they wanted to make it very clear that Hillary is very proud of Obama’s record and of his support and is eager to continue and develop on the progress that he has made when they responded the Trump’s tweet. (Khan) Similarly, on Facebook, their use of the platform didn’t change. On Facebook, Donald Trump was more visual than he was on Twitter. He used graphics which supports his opinions, short videos where he talks about his views, texts of press releases and photos from rallies. His team spent a big percentage of their budget to find new ways of using the digital tools and platforms on Facebook. Trump and his team created ads on Facebook. These ads were focused on concerns of people. They tried to find specific problems which people cared about. Their aim was to make people watch the ads who normally wouldn’t watch and believe tv commercials. Thanks to Facebook, a lot of people did actually watch the videos that actually covered their concerns. Trump’s Facebook page sent a message to its followers that the subjects they worry about will be fixed by Donald Trump. Similarly, Hillary Clinton and her media team also invested a big part of their budget to facebook ads which helped her followers to find out information just with one click. She shared her movements through her campaign and kept her feed updated so that her followers can see the campaign.

Overall, the political propaganda played a huge role in the election campaign. For this reason, both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton invested in their media and ads. They both focused on tv ads and social media. Even though they used similar sources, their style and the message they delivered were different. While Donald Trump’s propagandas focused on citizen’s fears and sent a message that Trump will make ‘America great again’ by basically eliminating the factors for fear, Hillary Clinton focused more on equality and human rights. Her propaganda sent a message that she will be a president and do her best for not only her supporters but for everyone in the United States of America. While Hillary Clinton’s propaganda was more logical, Donald Trump’s propaganda gained more attention and said what citizens of America wanted to hear.

Read more

2016 Election: an Unexpected Result

October 21, 2021 by Essay Writer

One day in March of 2016, I remember being in Spanish class watching a debate between my right-winged teacher and a liberal student. At that moment, I knew the 2016 Election would change the way people think about politics forever. Throughout the election, I had no doubt in my mind that Hillary Clinton would win the presidency. The idea of Donald Trump winning the electoral college seemed too far-fetched when looking at red versus blue states. I didn’t really consider his rhetoric, just previous electoral trends. Because Clinton’s candidacy was basically an extension of the Obama administration, I figured that the electoral map would look identical to the map in 2012. I thought swing states like Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Florida would go to Hillary because they voted democrat in the previous election. Boy was I wrong! I thought people would overlook her scandals and vote for her in order to continue the progress the Obama administration accomplished. I truly believed that the candidate’s policies would overcome all other factors in terms of voting, but I finally realized people don’t always vote based off policy. The 2016 election will change the way politicians will run their campaigns, present themselves, and explain past controversies in the next presidential election.

The 2016 election is still being discussed three years later, that’s how impactful that election was. There are many theories on why the election turned out the way it did. Some believe Trump capitalized on American’s fears and internalized racism, Clinton was power hungry and a criminal, others believe the American people were tired of the Washington establishment. There’s lots of speculation on how Trump won and how Hillary lost. Those two statements might sound redundant but the reasons for both are different. An anonymous staff article from the New York Post titled “Hillary’s presidential bid was doomed from the beginning”

Explains some missteps the Clinton campaign had in the 2016 election from the book Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign. This book was written by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes. Allen and Parnes are both geniuses about the Clinton family, they’ve written two books together on Hillary. Both authors have large political presences in such publications as The Hill and Politico.

The New York Post has a reputation for being conservative and it shows subtly in the article while being factually accurate. Considering the political leaning for this publication, I believe that majority of the audience for the New York Post is republican. A little over four percent of users who visited the New York Post website visited the Drudge Report immediately before, others came from Facebook and Google. I think this statistic confirms my assumptions about the audience of the New York Post. The article discusses the many issues the Clinton campaign faced in the 2016 election. Issues include the announcement of her candidacy, conflicting strategy ideas between her staff, scandals, and Clinton’s own shortcomings. The author of this article is trying to inform their readers on how we should have seen Clinton’s defeat before the election ended. I believe the author’s exigence for writing this article is to show that Trump winning wasn’t as unlikely as everyone thought. I also think the author’s purpose for writing this article is to suggest to the Democratic Party to choose a different candidate next time. The article also suggests that the American people are tired of the Clinton Dynasty (Clinton fatigue). This article is effective because it establishes ethos by taking examples from a book written by two Clinton experts. Regardless of the belittling language used against Clinton in the article, the facts are true and its up to the reader if they have a positive or negative opinion on the former presidential candidate after reading the article.

When reading this article at first, it was obvious the author had a negative view of Clinton from the verbiage that was used to describe issues about the campaign. The staff author describes Clinton’s advisers as “leaderless”, Clinton’s husband Bill as “meddling”, and calling Clinton “rusty as hell” in terms of connecting with voters from her book tour in 2014 promoting her book Hard Choices. These choices of words weren’t taken from Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign but it was instead interpreted from the author and then written in their own feelings and words.

The author also mentions an analogy stated by a former adviser from the Clinton campaign. This quote compares Clinton’s email scandal to a cold sore, “You never know when it’s going to pop up, you think you’re over it and then it pops up again”. Although the author of this article didn’t write that quote, he carefully selected it from a book to include it in his article. By using this quote, the target audience of this publication, conservatives, can confirm that Clinton is untrustworthy and can’t escape a scandal. This quote is simplistic and eye-catching to the reader. The quote probably gets stuck in their head and they could repeat it for an argument because the quote has a nice ring to it. This is what the author wants, the more people that disapprove of Clinton, the better.

Although the authors of the book mentioned in the article are creditable, the author of the article made a choice by choosing Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign over the autobiographical memoir What Happened by Hillary Clinton herself. Both books explain the mistakes made in the campaign, one is just written from the candidate herself. Yes, What Happened is biased towards Hillary because she wrote it, but in the book, she also identifies mistakes she’s made. For example, in the article the author critiques Clinton’s 2008 campaign saying Clinton made it all about her with a “I’m in it to win” attitude. While in What Happened, Hillary responds to this assumption by stating:

“In 2008, I had been criticized for arriving in Iowa like a queen, holding big rallies and acting like victory was inevitable. I never thought that was a fair description of me or our campaign; we believed I could prevail in a crowded and talented field, but we certainly didn’t take Iowa for granted. In fact, we recognized that it wasn’t an ideal first contest for me and spent a fair amount of 2007 trying to figure out how to make the best of it.” (Clinton, 130)

By only mentioning one book about Clinton’s election, the author misses out on personal testimony such as the one above. Of course, it’s hard to change public perception but when someone responds to an assumption at least hear them out. I’m sure the author knew about Clinton’s memoir but decided against citing it in order to maintain the narrative that Clinton is corrupt. Additionally, The New York Post audience might have dismissed Clinton’s word because they already believe she’s a liar thus causing authors at the publication to avoid referencing What Happened.

The final strategy I noticed the author of this article used was the lack of positive things to say about the campaign. Yes, this article is about the things done wrong with the campaign, but the author never used verbiage like “despite of” to at least give some credit to Clinton for trying. There are positive aspects of any campaign, including Trump’s! I mean he did win the presidency after all. There was no mention of anything Clinton did right or tried to make right. I also felt a vibe that the finger was always pointed at Clinton throughout the paper. Some things are out of the candidates control and it’s not always their fault. For example, the author critiqued Clinton’s introductory speech by saying “the failure of the speech to connect Hillary to a cause larger than herself”. I’ve watched the speech that Hillary made on Roosevelt Island, New York in 2015 and just like any politician they talk about the issues the country is facing, not just themselves. I’m sure the audience reading from the New York Post already has a negative opinion of Clinton and the material in this article just reinforces their thoughts. Using only negative information in this article is effective for its audience. I’m not surprised the author used only negative information for this article, they want and need to appeal to their base.

The article is well written and appeals mostly to its base and maybe a select few democrats that are curious on what the other side has to say. Any person who doesn’t support Clinton will find nothing wrong with this article. The article does a good job with remaining factual at all times. However, there are some interjectional opinions throughout the paper that shed a negative light on Clinton. Although I disagree with the subtle opinions, the author did a great job with creating a narrative to attract their target audience. I would’ve preferred a title more like “What Clinton Accomplished and Failed at in the 2016 election” to seem a little bit more non-biased. However, it’s unrealistic to expect media to be unbiased, we all have our own biases and should keep that in mind whenever we read a news article.

Read more

A Personal Take on Clinton’s Agenda and Why She’d Be Right for the Presidential Job

October 21, 2021 by Essay Writer

The 45th Presidential election has gained momentum and candidates are doing all they can to secure citizens support. Both Democrats and Republicans candidates are running, the famous Democrats include the Former US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Senator Jim Webb, the Republicans, on the other hand, include, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Donald Trump, Carly Fiorina just to mention a few. Being a democrat am in support of a Democrat candidate, Hillary Clinton to be precise. I think the Former US Secretary of state has a favorable chance and enough experience of becoming the 45th President of America. According to www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/plan-raise-american-incomes/ Hillary has several priorities for the American people. They include an economy plan, social security and Medicare, national security, LGBT equality and disability rights, K-12education and childhood education, immigration reform, labor and workforce and skills, criminal justice reform, among many other issues (Hillary For America). This paper will discuss why Hillary is my preferred candidate about the highlighted priorities.

In her early legal career Hillary Published a Harvard Educational Review titled, children under the law. In the publication, she advocated for the rights of children (Rodham 505). This illustrates Hillary’s interest in the fighting for the rights of American children even before acquiring power. Consequently, in her campaign manifesto she recognizes that every child has a right to live up to God’s given potential. As a senator, she was at the forefront calling for the national initiative to provide funds for the establishment of the Pre-K programs. As the first lady, she passionately introduced the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) program that was resourceful for parents to educate their children at home before going to school. She also runs the Hillary Clinton Foundation that assists children in learning the language better (Hillary For America).

Secondly, Hillary has been at the forefront in advocating for the rights of persons, her manifesto focus on the rights of persons with disability and the LGBT community. Even with the presence of the American Disability Act, persons with a disability still face a number of challenges especially concerning access to resources. As a senator, she advocated for the US joining the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Persons with a disability are from time to time denied access to gainful and meaningful employment (Hillary For America). Accordingly as the President, I believe it will be a new dawn for persons with disabilities. Concerning the rights of the LGBT community, Hillary has championed for hate crime legislation that protects the LGBT people in the workplace. She also fought for the end of restriction that prevented the LGBT people from adopting children. When she was the Secretary of State she enforced strong anti-discrimination legislations at the Global Level, for instance, she led in the passing of the UN Resolution on Human Rights that ended state discrimination against LGBT families. She applauded the recent Supreme Court verdict but recognizes that a lot needs to be done to achieve LGBT equality (Brammer 1).

Thirdly, being a lawyer Hillary advocates for criminal justice reform. She recognizes the prison cells are full and racial discrimination in our justice agencies. She adds that the question of race need to be recognized as a barrier to justice, the recent patterns of injustices, for instance, the Fergusons case are making the justice system flawed. She encourages the use of smart strategies to fight crime. Hillary also intends to reform the justice system by changing the approach to punishment and prison by pursuing alternative punishments for low offenders and do away with private prisons (Hillary For America).

The fourth priority Hillary intends to consider is raising the income of Americans by supporting Labor Unions. The Labor Unions builds the economy of the Middle class, this in return reduces the incidence of crime. Supporting the Labor Unions, therefore, means that the income of Americans is raised and hence the success of the Nation. She intends to restore the bargaining rights of Unions. She has previously sponsored the Employee Free Choice Act that aimed at strengthening the labor movement. She also supports increasing the Federal minimum wage to $12. This will protect workers from exploitation and support their families (Hillary for America).

Hillary recognizes that affordable health care is a basic human right. She has previously led the fight for access to quality, affordable healthcare. As the first lady, she helped create the Children’s Healthcare Insurance Program, which now provides cover for over 8 million children. She also introduced the Legislation to reduce the cost of Healthcare insurance expenses. As president, she plans to reduce the cost of prescription drugs. Additionally, she plans to defend the Affordable Care Act to make it easy for healthcare providers to best care for their patients. The healthcare system in the US requires massive transformation and Hillary plans to build a delivery system that will improve the quality of healthcare for Americans. The healthcare priorities include expansion of access to healthcare facilities for rural Americans and ensure access to reproductive health for women (Hillary For America).

Another priority is concerning immigration reform; in the recent years, Hillary has condemned the aggressive immigration laws in President Obama’s regime. She plans to have a fair and just immigration system. She says law-abiding citizens will be protected and offered a path to citizenship. She adds that the system will support the family since most Americans are family oriented and phase out private immigration detention centers. She will advocate for Congress to pass a legislation that will treat them with dignity, and uphold the laws (Hillary for America).

National security is one of Hillary’s core priorities; she plans to keep America stronger and safe. As the Secretary of State Hillary worked towards the restoration of America on top of the world. She had several accomplishments including the building of a global coalition that imposed sanctions on Iran and protection of Israel. She supported the decision of bringing Osama Bin Laden to justice. She plans to make sure that the US maintains a well-trained and equipped military, ready to respond to any challenges. She also intends to champion for the rights of LGBT globally and ensure that all people have equal access to information. As a smart leader she intend to ensure that Iran does not acquire nuclear weapon, defeat the ISIS, hold China accountable for its aggressive actions, and stand up to Putin for his actions (Hillary For America).

In conclusion, Hillary Clinton my presidential candidate since she articulates very critical issues that America faces. As a citizen, I would like my president to address issues such as guaranteeing criminal justice, access to education, the national security, the rights of minority groups, access to healthcare and the laws relating to labor. These are day-to-day problems encountered by Americans. Hillary has been a US senator, first lady and the Secretary of State. I believe that she has the understanding to address all this issues without a doubt.

Read more

The Stance on Guns in America Raised a Dialogue Between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders

October 21, 2021 by Essay Writer

“Hillary Clinton took on Sen. Bernie Sanders for his stance on guns at the first Democratic presidential debate Tuesday, saying he was “not at all” tough on guns. The debate’s moderator, Anderson Cooper, asked Clinton if the Vermont senator was tough enough on guns. ‘No, not at all,’ Clinton responded -– coming out of the gate strong on one of the only issues where she is considered to the left of Sanders… ‘Senator Sanders did vote five times against the Brady Bill,’ she continued. She also said he voted for a bill that helped protect the gun industry, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. ‘He also did vote as he said for this immunity provision. I voted against it,’ Clinton said. ‘I was in the senate at the same time. It wasn’t that complicated to me. It was pretty straightforward to me that he was going to give immunity to the only industry in America.’ In response to the criticism, Sanders defended his record, but focused on the need to build consensus across the aisle, saying he is from a rural state. ‘What I can tell Secretary Clinton, that all the shouting in the world is not going to do what I would hope all of us want,’ he continued. In the past, Sanders voted against the Brady Bill and for a bill that ‘protects gun manufactures from lawsuits from victims of gun violence.’ At the CNN debate on Tuesday, held at the Wynn hotel in Las Vegas, Cooper asked Sanders whether he believes that gun manufactures should be free from liability. ‘Of course not,’ Sanders said. ‘Do I think that a gun shop in the state of Vermont that sells legally a gun to somebody, and that somebody goes out and does something crazy, that that gun shop owner should be held responsible? I don’t.’ ‘On the other hand,’ he continued, ‘Where you have manufacturers and gun shops knowingly giving guns to criminals or aiding and abetting that, of course, we should take action.’”

Explanation: Bernie Sanders in this article stated that his opponent former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, had “misstated” his statement that people should stop “shouting” about gun control. In order to capture the attention of his audience, Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders over-exaggerates his arguments and makes his opponents look bad. In one particular response to a question about his contradictory beliefs on gun control, Sanders used the logical fallacy, Straw Man. This logical fallacy misrepresents the position on a situation. After being asked about gun control, Sanders says, “When you have gun shops knowingly giving guns to criminals, or aiding and embedding that, of course we should take action.” Instead of taking the approach that guns should be banned simply because of the danger that can be caused if the wrong person gets hold of one, Sanders decided to make a statement about how people who sell guns are completely aware of the fact that they are selling them to criminals. While there may be cases in which stores with weapons sell their products to known violent people, Sanders has no evidence that this is a constant problem. He makes a claim about people in order to make himself seem like the only viable option for bettering this nation. This logical fallacy is effective for Sanders in the sense that he is able to make eliminating gun availability appear to be by far the safest option. For those who sell guns or are more familiar with data on the difficulty in purchasing a gun, however, Sanders would come off as being ignorant.

Read more

An Argumentative Political Preference of Hillary Clinton as President

October 21, 2021 by Essay Writer

Madam President

During an election it is hard to decipher the truth when you are constantly exposed to political propaganda. However, when you look how each presidential candidate has behaved throughout their career, you can determine their character. Character, or personality, will determine a candidate’s ability to not only lead, but to compromise when necessary. A great president is someone who is able to communicate well, listen well, and be a diplomat without forgoing their own values. They should value family, reasonable freedoms and I believe among the candidates, Hillary Clinton is the most apt to lead and deserves the title “Leader of the Free World”.

Hillary Clinton has had a long career in politics and is well-educated. She graduated from Wellesley College and earned a J.D. from Yale Law School. As a woman, she has paved the way in politics she became the first female chair of the Legal Services Corporation, the first female partner at Rose Law Firm, and the first female senator of New York. As First Lady of Arkansas, she reformed the public school system and was on board of directors of Wal-Mart. Clinton’s democratic opponent, Bernie Sanders, often calls out her ties with corporate America (Gray). In the eyes of the population, her ties with Wall Street make her dishonest, untrustworthy. However, these people fail to remember Clinton has been immersed in politics for four decades. Hillary and her husband, Bill Clinton, are supported by corporations because whether you like it or not, their wealth gives them political power. For the Clintons to be agents of change, they have had to scratch the backs of big banks, corporations and the wealthy (Lazaroff). However, Hillary has always used her power for good.

Some of Hillary’s greatest accomplishments have been advocating for the rights of children. She co-founded Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families early on in her career and helped create the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, the Adoption and Safe Families Act and the Foster Care Independence Act. When Bill Clinton became president, as first lady she focused on the welfare of families, women and children. Although some of her ambitions failed, like reforming the health care system, she fought for reform and for the general good. She also advised her husband to appoint the first woman, Madeleine Albright, to be Secretary of State (Baker). The media is quick to dismiss these accomplishments. Even after her husband’s term in office, Hillary Clinton has remained in the White House. As Secretary of State, she had invaluable experience in foreign affairs. In 2016, we need someone who has experience because the U.S. is entangled in Middle East, Europe and Asia. Hillary Clinton is not a firestarter, she is level headed and has proven to be a diplomat, she will not make any rash decisions that could put our nation’s security at risk. For all these reasons, Clinton would make an excellent president.

The candidate you should absolutely never vote for is Donald Trump. Trump is a businessman, he has absolutely no experience in politics. He often makes vague, mean, racist, and sexist statements to provoke people and tap into our anger. When he controls our media and our emotions, he controls us. Let’s not give into the generic statement “Let’s Make America Great Again” when the man has never clearly specified what policies he would put in place. His grandest and most solid plan to date is to put a wall on the Mexican-American border and fund it using the Mexican government’s money. This plan would supposedly solve the immigration problem, but making the Mexican government pay for and creation of the wall is ludicrous. Even more, his hot-headed temper makes him impulsive and often he flip flops on serious issues. To give this man the title “Commander-in-Chief” would be dangerous because he has proven time and again that he is impetuous and lacks forethought. If he was elected president, I would be incredibly concerned about our country’s safety.

Hillary Clinton is really the best candidate out there. She has a solid record in politics, clocking in many decades and her values have stood the test of time. If anyone questions her morality, I would ask them: what would you do if you were in politics? A lot of politics is a money game, but that should not detract from her obvious objectives: to provide people with a better standard of living and to help the common good. While Bernie Sanders seems like a morally upright type of person, a lot of his policies are also vague and potentially dangerous. Breaking up Wall Street, our financial sector, and providing free college will not solve all of our nation’s problems. It could put our economy on edge and often Bernie Sanders fails to focus on other problems like foreign affairs. Clinton has the strongest background, good character, and a strength in perseverance that sets her apart from the noisy crowd. For these reasons, Hillary Clinton should be elected Madam President.

Read more

A Rhetorical Analysis of Hillary Clinton Speech on Women’s Rights

October 21, 2021 by Essay Writer

Hillary Clinton is an American lawyer and Politician who served as a U. S. Senator and secretary of the states (2009-2013). Hillary Clinton gave a speech in the conference of the “U.N. 4th World Conference on Women Plenary Session”. She starts the speech with pathos by thanking Gretrude Mangola. Secondly after giving thanks to the Secretary General she explains the importance of this conference in a few words to make her audience aware of the importance of the conference and her speech in such a conference. After a clarification about the conference she tries to lead her speech to her main point by giving logos as she values women`s efforts and contributions to the society in the very first part of her speech. Hillary Clinton`s main point from this speech is human`s rights which she defines human`s rights as women`s rights and women`s rights as human`s rights (31). The purpose of her speech is to persuade her audience that women`s rights matter same as human`s rights. She knows as in this conference there are important people from different countries so her audience are people from all over the world, and she can give her message to people from all over the world. After pointing to the main point of her speech which is human`s rights and women`s rights she brings up the questions that some of the audience might already have in their minds, she says “There are some who question the reason for this conference. There are some who wonder whether the lives of women and girls matter to economic” (Clinton 31). By this she wants to make her audience realize that she knows what she is talking about and in this speech, she is going to give clear respond to all these kinds of questions. Hillary Clinton in the speech of the U.N4th Conference on Women Plenary Session uses the rhetorical strategy of using the facts, emotions, and credibility. By this she tries to persuade her audience and to achieve her goal, which I am going to analyse it all in this essay.

Using of the ethos is one of the rhetorical strategies that Hillary Clinton uses to grab the attentions of her audience in this conference. “Using of ethos in speech shows practical wisdom, moral virtue, and goodwill toward the audience.” (Aristotle’s). Before Hillary Clinton continue her speech and bring any evidence to prove her claim she says “earlier today I participated in a World Health Organization forum. And we talked about ways that government officials, NGOs, and individual citizens are working to address the health problems of women and girls” (31). By pointing about her participation in another such important conference she gives credibility to her speech and make her audience understand that her words are trustable as she has attend many important conferences like this. She wants to convince her audience that she is experienced enough about women`s and girls’ conditions and since she has worked with such important organization she knows about women`s problems more than everyone else. Continuing to mentioning about her participation in those organizations today, she mentions about her tomorrow`s schedule, she says that she going to attend a fund gathering program which will help women access to credit so that they can improve theirs and their families lives(Clinton 31). By referring about her tomorrow she gives another credibility to her speech. She tries to make the audience see that she still works hard for women so what she says in this speech is trustable and comes from her experiences of working.

By using the logos in her Speech, Hillary Clinton tries to attract the attentions of the audience. As logos are the facts, she brings live examples and facts about women`s conditions and relate them to the point she says in her speech so she can prove her claim. As her claim is that we must consider women`s rights as humans rights, in a part of her speech she says “it is violation of human`s rights when doused in gasoline, set on fire, thousands of women are subjected to as a tactic or prize of the war” (Clinton 33). She knows this is a truth and it has happened or happening to women in different parts of the world. She uses this logo to grab the audience attention and make them realize what she says is based on facts and related to real situation of women in the world. She gives a strong evidence to prove her claim by using this fact about women`s lives. In a part of her speech, after giving a definition of freedom Hillary Clinton says “Women must enjoy the rights to participate fully in social and political lives of their countries, if we want freedom and democracy to thrive and endure” (34). As a lawyer and politician, she knows that this is a fact for everyone that freedom means to have liberty for all society, so the quote about democracy in her speech says that as women are making more than half of every society, we have the democracy and freedom when we do not forget about the rights of the half of our societies. This make a strong evidence for proving her claim.

Using pathos is another thing she does to make her speech more attractive to the readers or the audience. In many parts of her speech she uses pathos. “For Aristotle, pathos is an appeal to those states of mind that have an emotional component.” .This is a very right way that makes her point more clearly and also supports her prove the point. She starts her speech by saying thanks to the audience and those who invited her for this speech. Also as her main point of in this speech is about women`s rights, in many parts of her speech she make her claim stronger by using the emotion and being sympathy with women; as in a part she says “it is a violent of humans rights when individual women are raped in their own countries, when women and girls are sold into slavery of prostitution for human greed…..”(Clinton 33). This is to show how these injustices has touched her heart. She knows that everyone knows that it is not fair when we say human`s rights but more than half of our society is being treated like this. Using of emotion has made her speech more attractive to the audience.

In a nutshell, in the speech of U.N 4th conference Hillary Clinton addresses about the violence and inequality the women are facing all over the world. She wants the world to be peaceful by making people realize that all the human rights belong to the women too. IN her speech she uses the rhetorical strategies like: Logos like facts and evidences about women`s situations in the world, pathos like emotion, and credulities. As her claim in this speech is women`s rights, she supports her point by using the rhetorical strategies. This has attracted the attentions of her audience. This it helped her achieve her goal from the speech which is persuading the audience about her claim.

Read more
Order Creative Sample Now
Choose type of discipline
Choose academic level
  • High school
  • College
  • University
  • Masters
  • PhD

Page count
1 pages
$ 10