Good and Evil King Lear
Shakespeare’s disaster “King Lear” goes over many ideas the most important being the relationship in between excellent and wicked and the continuous battle of the revers; their reliance and the origin of wickedness, in addition to the reality that something great can never ever “ruin” anything all play a crucial function in the concern of if it is evil that destroys itself. The following essay will deliberate these ideas and compare good and evil throughout the play to reveal the self-destruction evil triggered for itself.
Throughout the entire play of “King Lear” there are many acts of goodness as well as acts of wickedness that represent the two ideas of virtue versus deviltry that depend upon each other. Without the good there might not be any evil and the same opts for evil due to the fact that without the opposite they could not be compared and for that reason not be determined as being either great or bad. King Lear would never ever have realized the dreadful error he made when he claimed that “absolutely nothing will come of absolutely nothing” (Act 1, Scene 1), would it not have been for Cordelia’s vicious sis that drove evil too far and made their daddy freak.
Their wicked behavior towards their dad can be seen in Act 1 Scene 3 where Goneril instructs a servant to be rude and less polite to Lear. “Put on what weary neglect you please, you and your fellows: I ‘d have it pertain to question” she says, buying the servant to show Lear no respect which highlights her evil intentions. Only Lear’s madness makes him see his truthful child and likewise who deceived him. If Regan and Goneril were not evil, Lear would have never ever seen his overlook and he could not have seen the reality and his child’s genuine intentions.
Nevertheless, if Regan and Goneril were to have actually been excellent, there would not have actually been a mistaken belief at the distribution of the kingdom which would have led to Lear picking his preferred daughter over the two others and Regan and Goneril being left with absolutely nothing which would have made the audience feel compassion towards them and give every character a new idea of great and wicked. Therefore both virtue and deviltry are essential for the play since they enhance each other’s distinctions and highlight the opposites much more, further altering the story that depends upon both extremes.
All the evil happenings in the tragedy of King Lear can be related back to goodness which makes good the cause of evil, adding to another relationship and connection the two opposites share. The virtuous side created wickedness which you can see clearly through Edmond’s treachery against his father and brother. This can be seen in Act 1, Scene 2 where Edmond’s soliloquy clearly underlines his evil plot of replacing his brother as his father’s heir. “[…] Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land.
Our father’s love is to the bastard, Edmond, as to th’legitimate […] if this letter speed and my invention thrive, Edmond the base shall to th’legitimate. I grow; I prosper; now gods, stand up for bastards! ” he exclaims. This is the first time the audience sees how evil and vicious Edmond is and what his plans are. If Gloucester had not treated his “bastard son” so badly, he might not have turned so evil. However, because his father continuously showed Edmond that he preferred Edgar over him, Edmond grew up with such a bad attitude towards him which led to his evil plot and his vicious actions.
Thereupon, goodness is responsible for the creation of evil and without the good wickedness could not exist. Furthermore, the destruction of evil could not have been through goodness because if goodness were to destroy anything it could no longer be identified as “good”. This states that the word “destruction” already implies a negative and evil idea where as good would be determined as the opposite. Cordelia is a purely good character which shows even when she had the chance to fight evil, she did not reach for brutality or destruction of bad but rather tried to help the good and fix the terrible situation.
Accordingly, if good were to destroy evil it could no longer be called “good” because it would be on the same level as evil and could not be differentiated anymore. It is therefore impossible for good to destroy evil, since it is basically incapable of wicked actions. Edmond’s death, however, could indicate the vanquishing of evil through good. The brothers Edmond and Edgar that represent evil and good, fight until Edgar finally kills his brother.
On one hand, one could possibly see this as good overcoming evil since the “good” brother killed the “evil” brother; yet this certain feeling of hope is quickly crushed by the tragic ending and the deaths of most of the main characters representing goodness in the play. On the other hand, it is evil that caused its own destruction all along due to the fact that it took on more than it could handle, striving for too much power which ultimately led to its own downfall. Edmond started off with a plan of taking over his brother’s and then his father’s position but he got carried away by
the idea of power that he competed for a position that was too high for him which eventually made him fail. If Edmond had only aimed for ranks that were within his reach, he would have successfully accomplished his goal. Edmund’s deviltry can be seen until the very end, where he confesses to have ordered for Cordelia and Lear to be hanged, just before he dies. “I pant for life. Some good I mean to do, despite of my own nature” he reveals, wanting to at least do one good deed before his life is over.
Yet because he tried to scheme for even more power, he is responsible for his own elimination and the cause of his failure. Another example of evil’s own vanquishing is the battle between the sisters Goneril and Regan. At the beginning they fight on the same side against their father yet towards the end of the play they both become to obsessed with the idea of power that they turn against each other to strive for everything. They both fight over Edmond and are too greedy to want to share the kingdom.
This can certainly be seen in Act 4, Scene 2 when Goneril says “One way I like this well; but being widow, and my Gloucester with her, may all the building in my fancy pluck upon my hateful life” which indicates that Goneril is scared that her sister will take Edmond away from her. Their betrayal upon each other can also be recognized through Regan’s poisoning by Goneril in Act 5, Scene 3. When Regan falls to the ground ill, Goneril says “If not, I’ll ne’er trust medicine” foreshadowing Regan’s soon death. The sisters greed for power grew so strong that the betrayed each other just to reach a goal.
This shows that the two variants of deviltry destroyed themselves through selfishness and greed. Throughout the tragedy of King Lear the fight between good and evil brings forward many connections and highlights the relationship of the two opposites. Not only are they dependent upon each other, wickedness was created by purity and without one the other could not exist. Virtue is also incapable of destruction leaving all these notions to prove that good did not vanquish evil, but that it was evil that destroyed itself.
King Lear and Gloucester are similar to an extent of being tragic heroes, because they both experience the traditional features of a classic tragedy. Both characters go through the features […]
One of Shakespeare’s greatest tragedies ever written, King Lear, is one that deals with many aspects of human condition. It is recognized as a difficult and complex play, but Kurosawa’s […]
Filial ingratitude is a dominant theme in King Lear. It is a universal theme in the sense that it is common to find many sons and daughters who show much […]
The term existentiality was used in the work of philosophers in the 1800s and the 1900s. The concept holds that people should focus on dealing with the present conditions of […]
Sometimes, unconsciously, role play is used in our daily lives to assume or act out a specific role. The role play portrayed in Shakespeare’s King Lear and Michael Healey’s The […]
Wisdom is a difficult thing to define and understand. It’s easily recognized when people have experienced it. Wisdom is a tricky thing to obtain. Wisdom is the quality of having […]
After watching both films, A Thousand Acres made in 2007 starring Michelle Pfeiffer, Jessica Lange and Jason Robards and King Lear made in 2008 starring Ian McKellen, Frances Barber and […]
In this article Neville’s key ideas are focused on the aspect of fathering. He makes connections between the fathering patterns of Lear, Gloucester and Cornwall. He starts with describing Regan’s […]
Animal Imagery in King Lear A common misconception during the Elizabethan Era is that humans are superior to animals. Fudge shows this by stating: “where there is a fear of […]
Shakespeare’s disaster “King Lear” goes over many ideas the most important being the relationship in between excellent and wicked and the continuous battle of the revers; their reliance and the […]