The Tragic Hero in Gangster Films: Goodfellas, A Dommed Downfall
The characters in gangster films have many similar characteristics to Aristotle’s “tragic hero ideas”. In the 1990 gangster film “Goodfellas”, as the gangsters have more and more hamartia, these fatal flaws become their weaknesses and finally lead them to the downfall of the tragic heroes. The similar beginning of tragic heroes and gangsters. In Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero, a tragic hero must be essentially an admirable and good person or born noble because of a successful person’s downfall could evoke feelings of pity and fear. In the movie “Goodfellas”, the main character Henry was holding a wedding with his wife Karen. At the wedding, countless of people gave them red envelopes. Congratulations, compliments filled the entire ballroom because of Henry ‘s high position in the gang. The bride and groom were dancing freely, they were not afraid of others stealing the gift money, because the room was full of Henry’s ‘brother’ and ‘friends’. So, even though all the three main characters are not noble birth, they still were very successful and powerful in their gangs at first. Just like the lines in the movie said, “We(gangsters) did whatever they want. We double-parked in front of a hydrant, nobody ever gave us a ticket. We play jack all night, nobody would call the police.” Therefore, the gangster Henry did qualify Aristotle’s basic requirement of a tragic hero. Henry was powerful and famous in the gang and nobody can hurt him.
“Hubris” is a Greek word, it means the excess of pride. Aristotle’s idea claims that hubris is the beginning of a tragic hero. Tragic heroes always start at a very high position and this usually makes them have hubris and very strong self-confidence. In “Goodfellas”, Henry has also had hubris. As in Henry’s words said, “those who go to prison are those who go because they can’t stand their wives’ nagging. Or, to put it another way, the blacks had screwed up by popping drugs and sleeping on their way home. Henry thought he never screwed up, so there was no reason to go to jail.” Henry always believed he was different from others, he thought he won’t make any mistake that would screw his lives. Henry believed he was the man of the city, the man that can control everything, and everyone worked for him. According to Warshow’s article, “The gangster is the man of the city, with the city’s language and knowledge, with its queer and dishonest skills and its terrible daring, carrying his life in his hands like a placard, like a club.” This quote fully expresses the lawlessness and overconfidence of the gang in the film. The gangsters in the movie believe they are the strongest in the city. They can steal stuff and rob airports at any time. Then no one will report them or call the police because the gangsters can buy everyone’s mouth shuts. Everyone would get a piece of cake.
Life has its ups and downs, the highest peaks also herald the craziest declines. However, the declines won’t come from nihility. There is always a particular point that would play as a trigger. “Hamartia” is that special point. It represents a flaw, a tragic flaw that would cause a man to the downfall or even to death. As a gangster, Henry also has many hamartia and is also his weakness. The first tragic flaw Henry made was selling drugs secretly with his two partners and “girlfriend”, even though he knew the mafia boss Pauli did not allow them to sell drugs. But, he was still doing it because he needed money to maintenance his family living condition. This is definitely a dangerous move. If the secret is exposed, he would get whacked by Pauli or the corps.
The second tragic flaw Henry made was to involve in the biggest heist in American history: The Lufthansa Heist. Jimmy and Tommy, were Henry’s best partners. They always did things together. Robberies, crimes, murderers, they all went through those together. And this time, they were also together and finished this ultimate heist successfully again. They got a total of six million in this heist and that was already a really big wealth in the 1990s. Even this incident also brought them a lot of trouble in the future.
These two incidents were Henry’s hamartia that made his life impossible to turn over again. In Aristotle’s idea of tragedy, hamartia does not include normal mistake. The hamartia is actually a mistake that always has no chances to change, to repair even if the person recognizes the flaw and its consequences after it happened. The downfall was doomed.
A Dommed Downfall
It was another day of “Sell Drugs Day’, Henry was hiding the drugs on his nanny as usual, prepared to let her bring the drugs on the plane. Unfortunately, this time, Henry failed. His meth location was found by the police, and his partner also identified Henry. Henry was arrested and can be sent to the jail. Henry decided to find Jimmy and asked for help.
After the Lufthansa heist was posted on the newpapers and television. Jimmy was very nervous. He was afraid the heist would come out because there were too many people involved in the robbery this time. His minds started going in eight different directions at once. The stress finally was overwhelmed, Jimmy was pissed and started to kill everyone involved in the case and also this included Henry because Henry was getting pinched at that time. Henry wanted Jimmy to save him but Jimmy decided to send him to Mexico for killing another partner and also to hide for a period of time. Henry suddenly knew Jimmy wanted to whack him this time and right now he had no choices to choose. No matter he was going to ask Pauli or followed Jimmy’s opinion which ways he will die!
In the end, Henry became the witness to identify Pauli and Jimmy in order to be in the protection program. Henry survived in the game. He didn’t go to jail but he was sent to a safe house in the wilderness. He was under house arrest and can’t even get decent food for his whole life. In his own words, “I get to live the rest of my life like a schnook”. The ending was cruel to Henry. He lived his whole life in danger of excitement, like a colorful movie. These excitements and successes had already brought him astonishing wealth and status, which had made him became a spendthrift and extravagant man. Locking him in a cage in the wilderness for a whole life was worse than death for him in some ways. It is interesting to see these downfalls come up one by one. As an audience, I knew the end of a tragedy is coming closer and closer. Use the words in Warshow’s article, “the gangster is doomed because he is under the obligation to succeed, not because the means he employs are unlawful. In the deeper layers of the modern consciousness, all means are unlawful, every attempt to succeed is an act of aggression.”
Before Henry’s downfall happens, he did realize his mistakes and he knew these mistakes were fatal and could lead him to “big trouble” if become discovered. This tragic recognition and insight are called “Anagnorisis” in Aristotle’s idea. The tragic hero might have an increase of self-awareness and self-knowledge after they made their tragic flaws. It is also the implication of the tragedy. In “Goodfellas”, as Henry took more and more drugs, he knew he could not turn back. His hands and feet began to paralyze and almost caused him to crash while he was driving. When he went to the hospital to pick up his nephew, the doctor saw that his face was pale and asked him to hospitalized immediately. Henry said that he just did not eat breakfast and refused, but at that moment he knew that he might die because of drug-used in the end or be wracked by Pauli.
If we look at the whole story from Henry’s aspect, we can find out that the plot is actually the process of “establish a rule, then break them. Establish a rule again, then break it again.” At first, Henry was breaking his father’s rules and accepting the rules of the gang. Later, the first court trial established the rule ‘never rat on a friend’, and in the end, Henry was a witness to identify his partner. Paulie determined the ‘no white powder’ rule with him, and then in order to make more money, Henry chose to sell it secretly, which was to break the rule again.
At this time, the gangster’s life was already determined. They just keep struggling in the “intolerable dilemma” and can’t escape. According to Warshow’s article, “This is our intolerable dilemma: that failure is a kind of death and success is evil and dangerous, is ultimately impossible. The effect of the gangster film is to embody this dilemma in the person of the gangster and resolve it by his death. The dilemma is resolved because it is his death, not ours. We are safe; for the moment, we can acquiesce in our failure, we can choose to fail.” Gangsters are doomed because of the way they choose to succeed is illegal. No matter how high the position they reach, they would be finally down. They would be arrested in one day, this is their destiny.
After watching the whole movie and analyze the plots, we can conclude that the main character in a gangster movie is a tragic hero. “But the gangster’s loneliness and melancholy are not authentic’; like everything else that belongs to him, they are not honestly come by: he is lonely and melancholy not because life ultimately demands such feelings but because he has put himself in a position where everybody wants to kill him and eventually somebody will.”
In Alice Munro’s short story “Boys and Girls”, depicts society’s expectation of gender roles through the cynical tone, and how there is no escape from the stereotypes society places on […]
Robert compares his biological father to those that keep on working for companies and people, after studying And managing to get degrees, but still can’t get any further in life. […]
Franz Kafka wrote, “The Trial”, during the early stages of World War I, that illustrates a society during this time that uses their legal system as a weapon to inflict […]
The journey of a fictional character is written to reflect the ways of the authors culture. The author uses symbolisms of common things to represent or convey a greater message […]
Even though all basic human freedoms for African Americans were denied during the late part of the 1900’s in the American South, how were white Southerners not able to see […]
Individuals appear to get rid of traditional communal context as status-based class and gender differentials society, however, instead of being ‘disembedded’ from a traditional one, young people in late modernity […]
We have all been through fallacious arguments, either as subjective makers of those arguments or as passive receivers. Many of us do not even realize such fallacies that we make […]
In the passage from “Last Child in the Woods”, Richard Louv uses devices such as imagery, facts, and rhetorical questions to convey his critical tone, which turns to nostalgia, towards […]
Introduction I was intrigued to write my extended essay on Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela especially because growing up as a kid, I heard so many compliments about him. During […]
The characters in gangster films have many similar characteristics to Aristotle’s “tragic hero ideas”. In the 1990 gangster film “Goodfellas”, as the gangsters have more and more hamartia, these fatal […]