Rhetorical Analysis: Fahrenheit 9/11 Free Essay Example

April 13, 2022 by Essay Writer

Michael Moore, a democratic politically aware activist, is a well-known director and filmmaker. He is acknowledged for his stimulating, provocative and unexpected films. Moore is an astonishing political reviewer and knows accurately how to take advantage of the art of language, film, and actualities to influence his onlookers to believe and follow the director’s perspective. Fahrenheit 9/11 was released in 2004, this documentary was directed and produced by Moore. This motion picture is a brilliant illustration of how Moore practices tragedy, logic, and ethics to obtain more verification and supportive details to make his argument evident.

These appeals are composed to strengthen Moore’s arguments and support his theories in politics. Moore uses the following appeals to persuade his spectators to come to an agreement with him on the debates that, in his opinion, led to the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001. In the film, Fahrenheit 9/11, Michael Moore efficiently uses tragedy, ethics, and logic as tools to influence his spectators to have confidence that the Bush’s Administration was immoral.

In effort to influence the audience, Moore does an outstanding job of conveying an expressive response. Tragedy is showed on screen within the first few seconds of the film and the only sound is the noise from September 11, the day planes were commandeered by terrorists and crashed into the twin towers, placed in New York City. The viewer can hear the shock in the people’s voices and the lurid explosion from the planes striking the buildings. This scene was immensely powerful. Moore’s purpose for this scene was to start the film off was to encourage his audience into having the same sensation that the director felt and to understand how horrifying this tear-jerking incident accurately was.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper


Deadline: 10 days left

Number of pages


Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

“You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy”

Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

Also, an interview with a woman who lost her husband during the occurrence on September 11 was additional technique that Moore used tragedy in Fahrenheit 9/11 to convert his audiences. There was a purpose that this interview was filmed close up, Moore desired the audience to witness the wretchedness in the widow’s eyes, to feel the aching that she had felt and to display the emptiness she had. By screening the widower’s sentiments, Moore composed the viewer’s sympathy. However, he still left every single scene open-ended for the viewers to accumulate their own judgement on the attack that happened on that horrendous day.

In order to have a true argument, a person ought to validate impartiality; one should be reasonable to the other objective viewing platform and demonstrate that there is an understanding of both sides of the argument. This is the second appeal, ethics, a method of persuasion used by Moore to demonstrate that he is a reasonable and well-informed man. Ethics is all about being trustworthy; presenting oneself as a dependable person to convince an audience and make a disagreement relevant; or to show that another person is not credible by using manipulation. When using ethics, the speaker’s character is really revealed and observed by the audience. It is important to have ethics when making a claim or assuring an argument.

In Fahrenheit 9/11, Moore went out of his way to make the viewer see the ethics throughout the film, so that his spectators would be convinced to have faith in his philosophies. The director desired that his audience to see how dependable his evidence was and to let them know that he is a trustworthy person; in this case, he required the audience to believe he was more responsible than President George W. Bush and his Administration. To confirm that Moore was a credible source and to query Bush’s charisma, Moore used actual videotape of Bush and the actions that was affected upon. The director showed the following footage of the time when Bush was initially told about the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001; this footage exposed Bush’s response. Shockingly, President Bush did not respond and instead continued to read to a class that he was visiting that day. This helped manipulate the audience to have faith that Bush was not a suitable president and had no awareness what to do in this circumstance.

Another video that was publicized was of Bush in conferences with adherents of the Bin Laden family. This footage made it ostensible that President Bush was associating with the “enemy,” the ones who were alleged to be behind the attack. This makes the spectators look at Bush in a tremendously meager light and was a tool used to encourage the audience to critic Bush’s character based on this circumstance exclusively. Moore used this appeal again when he presented evidences about President Bush’s National Guard archives. The director exposed that Bush’s records were interfered with in the commencement to hide a particular name, James R. Bath, a Texas money manager for the Bin Laden family. Moore also presented what the original and uncensored archives looked like before they had been modified. This displayed that Moore was reasonable, but then again, he was likewise responsible with the evidence that he was presenting, unlike Bush who did not present truthful records.

In Moore’s attempt to manipulate and influence his listeners, he uses the last appeal, logic, to display his perceptive and by what means he has come to think undesirably about Bush’s Administration and the event of the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001. The director’s foremost effective fact made was about the debate surrounding Bush’s election, and his win over his rival, Al Gore. Moore have confidence in that the reason for Bush’s triumph was due to his assistance from his political associates along with the aid from his friends and family. Moore presents that Al Gore was primarily supposed to have been the winner over Florida, but then Fox News reporter, John Ellis, Bush’s first cousin and the main in charge of the verdict desk that night, called the election in courtesy of Bush. The director then deliberates the additional cause for why Bush won the election, his reasons were that Bush’s brother was the prior Governor of Florida, the state in interrogations and the place that the election disagreement was at its most discriminating.

Also, Bush’s chairman of his campaign organized the votes and it is a fact that her state appointed a company that knocked the votes of African Americans off the record. Moore then traces on the specifics about the numerous autonomous investigations that were apprehended and exposed that Gore was the true winner of this election. Stated in the film, Fahrenheit 9/11, “Even if numerous investigations prove that Gore got the most votes, it won’t matter, just as long as all your daddy’s friends on the Supreme Court vote the right way.” It was apparent that the Supreme Court, which is made up of of friends of Bush’s father, was the true deciders of the winner of this election. One last reason for why Bush became President was also influenced by the missing senate on the day that the joint session was to verify the election results. Plenty of African Americans attempted to appeal the election results due to overwhelming evidence of misconduct, but no senator was located to sign the objection and come to the aid of the African Americans.

Moore’s film, Fahrenheit 9/11, was a thought-provoking documentary that offered an argument that was reinforced by tragedy, logic, and ethics. Tragedy was a remarkably effective implement that the director used numerous occasions throughout the film to influence his audience; in an effort to get people to have consideration to what he was saying. For instance, the sensitive response that was created from the audience was brought about from the scene of the attack on September 11, 2001 was tremendously significant. Ongoing, Moore’s trustworthiness revealed through documents and confident evidences, along with his laughable strategies used to question Bush’s character, was an additional method of appeal that Moore used to support his argument. Lastly, logical reasoning reinforced Moore’s argument and assisted to change the viewers to make their views relating to these political issues. These appeals helped to enhance the director’s focal viewing platform and assisted to convert his audiences to have confidence that Bush’s administration was corrupt.


Read more