Reflection on The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare: Opinion Essay

May 18, 2022 by Essay Writer

Introduction

The tragedy of Julius Caesar is a historical drama which is written by William Shakespeare in 1599. Its events are actually based on true events from Roman history. Shakespeare’s special fashion of tragedy includes a character whose poor alternatives motive his social downfall and ultimately bring about his very own death. Julius Caesar suits this description as Brutus’s selection to murder Caesar outcomes in his fall from social grace and his suicide. Other vital factors for a tragedy encompass catharsis (a launch and purging of emotions), supernatural factors like ghosts, Gods and magic, and comedic relief. While all these elements are important in a tragedy, we will communicate approximately the three most seen and identifiable tragic elements in Julius Caesar.

Text

‘Tragedy, branch of drama that treats in a serious and dignified style the sorrowful or terrible events encountered or caused by a heroic individual. By extension the term may be applied to other literary works, such as the novel.'[footnoteRef:1] [1: Richard B. Sewall and Leonard W. Conversi.’Tragedy’.Encyclopædia Britannica.Encyclopædia Britannica, inc. November 17, 2019.]

Caesar is given guidelines of what’s in store for him a couple of times, including through his wife, Calphurnia, who dreams about Caesar’s murder. Calphurnia goals that Caesar’s statue is bleeding, and Romans are bathing their arms in it (II, ii, 75-79) – a dream that proves to be pretty prophetic, not simplest metaphorically however also literally, because the conspirators do truely shower in Caesar’s blood, upon killing him. Therefore, Shakespeare makes it clear that the workings of fate play a giant part in the activities that therefore unfold.

It is indicated, thru his verbal exchange with Calphurnia, that he thinks that being the demigod he believes himself to be, he would be protected from anything fate has in store.

He states, “The things that threatened me/ Ne’er looked but on my back; when they shall see/ The face of Caesar, they are vanished,” (II, ii, 10-13).

“…For these predictions are to the world in general as to Caesar,” he tells Calphurnia (II, ii, 28-29)

Caesar holds an implicitly fatalistic view of the sector and human life. He says, “What can be avoided/ Whose end is purposed by the gods?” (II, ii, 26-27),

His lines also gave support to his fatalism:

Of all the wonders that I yet have heard,

It seems to me most strange that men should fear,

Seeing that death, a necessary end,

Will come when it was come. (II, ii, 34-37)

In Caesar’s case, it became his very own actions and arrogant nature that led to his fate.

As he decided to go to the senate and not stay at home. If he stayed at home he would’ve been able to prevent his unfortunate end, he wasn’t convinced with his fate and he didn’t think that it could be real which lead to his tragic end.

Brutus decides to sign up for the conspiracy towards Caesar as he is positive that with Caesar as its ruler, Rome’s fate will be destruction. Brutus is adamant that he’s going to do whatever in his power to trade the direction of this fate.

“Brutus had rather be a villager/ Than to repute himself a son of Rome/ Under these hard conditions as this time/ Is like to lay upon us,” (I, ii, 172-175).

He truly thinks that with the aid of killing Caesar, he can shop Rome from its destiny. Where Caesar believed himself to be immune from destiny, Brutus feels that he can manipulate destiny. However, this belief in his power over fate is shown after Caesar has been killed.

Brutus finds out that he cannot control the circumstances and he is now aware that the only way to his freedom is ”take the current when it serves.”

eventually he unearths himself subjecting to fate and by the point he commits suicide, he sees this cease as some thing inevitable – some thing that needed to happen because he killed Caeser

Brutus, “senses that this is no accident of defeat but the working of the destiny to which he committed himself long before,” (137).

Brutus eventually submitted to his fate that he has brought upon himself as he is feeling.

Cassius complete conviction is man’s capability to modify his own destiny is apparent proper from the beginning. In the speech in which he convinces Brutus to join the conspiracy, he dismisses the idea of blaming fate or destiny for what takes place on your life

He says:

Men at some time are masters of their fate:

The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,

But in ourselves, that we are underlings. (I, ii, 139-141)

This affirmation of his freedom from the workings of future does not trade even after the assassination of Caesar. Unlike Brutus, who sees suicide as subjection to fate, Cassius views this act of self-annihilation as exerting manipulate over his fate. Cassius tells Casca ‘no stony tower, nor walls of beaten brass’ can withstand the strength of spirit. that Cassius does, however, start to renowned future as greater influential than he used to just accept as real with it to be. But this is handiest half of of proper, as he says, Therefore, Cassius, in assessment to Brutus, does not give up his lifestyles happy of man’s powerlessness towards destiny.

Works Cited

  1. Richard B. Sewall and Leonard W. Conversi.’ Tragedy’.Encyclopædia Britannica.Encyclopædia Britannica, inc. November 17, 2019.

SOURCE

Read more