Rapid Growth as a Destabilizing Force to Effective Democracy Essay
The developmental undertakings within a nation that undergoes nontrivial transitions in democracy are directly analyzed. In countries where democracy dominates are established to develop rapidly compared to a priori identical nations, while in countries where democracy is not much practiced economic progress is comparably less.
These variations do not appear to be due to distinctions in investment and education levels. The purpose of this paper is to establish the connection between democracy and economic development.
Democracy and Economic Development
Whether educated or trained in terms of modernization point of view or the chronological stand point, theories explicating the cradle of democracy possess deterministic characteristics.
Contained in the theory of modernity no stimulates or causes democracy, but instead it is generated by economic advances and the consequent changes in the society.
According to Moore in his theory, chronicle can be altered by social strata actors; nevertheless, they maneuver at a distance of generations with the agrarian social stratification structure of the 17th century determining the forms of government embraced in varied countries with reference to two or three centuries later (Mayer, Patterson & Thames, p. 299, para 3).
With reference to Przeworski outline of phenomenological observations, this deterministic stress resulted to a view of all methodologies being extraneous whenever an issue regarding democratization was presented in political forums during the 1970s period.
The heroes in the democratic battles did not and could not be persuaded that the destiny of their nations would based either on the contemporary levels of progress and advancement or by the far-away past events.
They held that, even though within confinements, democratization was a repercussion of actions, and not just states. Thus, some initiatives were taught based on actors and plans instead of being enlightened in terms of deterministic situations (Mayer, Patterson & Thames, p. 302, para 2).
This paper’s makes inferences that profoundly justify the later perspective. The surfacing of egalitarianism is not a derivative of growth in the economic sphere. Democratic system is or is not founded by political figures undertaking their ends, and it may be instigated at any developmental point.
It is after establishment that economic problems becomes active and can be held responsible, hence the probability of democratic system to survive is higher when the country’s economic development is at a reputable position.
Hitherto even the most recent country’s wealth status is not crucial: egalitarianism is by far likely to endure in an economy that is progressive with below $1,000 revenue per capita compared to where revenue ranges between $1,000 and $2,000 that diminishes in economic terms.
If these two nations or countries make it in secreting progress, it is very possible for democracies even in the poorest countries to endure recession (Mayer, Patterson & Thames, p. 305, para 8).
Basing the argument from this stand point, the idea of the link between progress and egalitarianism that subjugated the intellectual attitude and served to familiarize U.S abroad measures during cold war seems in a bizarre manner complicated.
Even though Lip set viewed economic development as an exogenous variable, his colleagues were convinced that authoritarianism is the unavoidable cost that brought by development. Galenson asserts that the self-governed a regime is, the higher the degree of resources dissemination from savings to the expenditure.
According to arguments posited by De Schweinitz, if the underdeveloped nations are to economically develop, restriction of their democratic contribution in political issues becomes mandatory. Accordingly, for development to be realized, despotism plays a fundamental role (Mayer, Patterson & Thames, p. 304, para 5).
Conclusively, since this paper supposes that despotism causes economic development which in turn yields democracy, it becomes then logical to claim that the most suitable approach to democracy is a meandering one. In addition, commonsense shows that for democracy to be strong it is individual citizens to reinforce it through despotism rejection at all cost.
Therefore, at least with modernity most long-lasted despotic regimes especially in the Eastern region of Europe in the end collapses. Most of the nations established recently, many of which are languishing in absolute poverty even after being granted sovereignty, are still drowning in poverty with the few that resisted development still retaining dictatorship (Mayer, Patterson & Thames, p. 301, para 1).
Mayer, L., Patterson, D., & Thames, F. (2009). Contending Perspectives in Comparative Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
The role of Islam in the transition to democracy in Indonesia This paper will discuss how Islam and democracy interact in Indonesia. The paper will look at the role of […]
Introduction Democracy is can be described as a style of government whereby each and every citizen has a say in matters that influence their lives. Democracy the most common form […]
Explain the four faces of democracy. What are the basic conditions for democratic governance? Please use specific examples to illustrate your points What is democracy? Democracy is a complex term […]
Introduction Democracy is a form of government where people have equal rights, make decisions concerning their lives and have a direct or indirect participation in the social, economic, cultural and […]
Democracy simply means the rule by simple people. It was created as a solution to abuse of power by rulers. Democracy as opposed to other forms of governments guarantees basic […]
A liberal representative democracy should be understood as a form of democracy where we have people who are elected to represent others. In this case, representatives hold some power that […]
Democracy and dictatorship play a role in paths that lead to political development. While democracy in itself provides a variety of friendliness amongst the people, dictatorship, on the other hand, […]
Introduction The political regimes are a set of partisan structure that makes up a nation such as a political system or a ruler in a political system. They are simple […]
Introduction Typically, democracy is a system of governance in which people choose their preferred government and rulers. This can be exercised through voting in a free and fair mannerism.1 It […]
Introduction The developmental undertakings within a nation that undergoes nontrivial transitions in democracy are directly analyzed. In countries where democracy dominates are established to develop rapidly compared to a priori […]