Family Values as Expressed Through Ostriches and Elephants
In Fiela’s Child, the two families, the van Rooyens and the Komoeties, have a strong connection with animals, albeit not always a positive connection. The van Rooyens have a problem with elephants in the forest. The Komoeties’ ostriches give the family all kinds of trouble. Other animals are made reference to throughout the novel, as well. Given ostriches, elephants, other animals, family values, and various examples of foil, symbolism, and metaphors, the ostriches and the elephants represent the families of the van Rooyens and the Komoeties.
Kicker and Pollie are the Komoetie family’s ostriches. The family had Kicker for a very long time, and then they got Pollie in the hopes of mating the two. However, things do not go according to plan at first; Kicker hardly glances at Pollie, which worries Fiela: “It was more than four weeks since they had started taking the ostriches to pasture and still Kicker showed no sign of being ready to take the hen” (39). Most animals have a very decisive, instinctual way of wanting to mate. However, Kicker did not- it was almost as if he were human, fighting his instincts. Pollie, too, proves to be a strange ostrich: “To get her out of the enclosure was less trouble than they had thought it would be…head in the air and all the old haughtiness about her” (38). The Komoeties did this very soon after they received the ostrich, so they expected her to be less tame, to fight them more. Then, soon after the census men leave, Pollie begins dancing: “Pollie was dancing…she was performing the strange ostrich dance of joy” (41). This is strange because, like Kicker, it is almost as if Pollie is human. It seems as though she is celebrating Benjamin’s safety for the time being, an example of anthropomorphism. Animals do not truly celebrate things. However, once Benjamin appears to be out of harm’s way, the hen begins to happily dance. The ostriches act as though they are human.
The elephants are viewed as dangerous creatures in the Knysna Forest; they are also known as “bigfeet.” The ivory in their tusks is greatly sought after, though their enormous bodies stop most poachers from getting too close, and Elias van Rooyen is no exception. The bigfeet are one of Elias’ biggest fears, and he is justified in that fear: “‘…the cow picked him up with her trunk and threw him…Black and blue he was from head to toe’” (320). When Benjamin comes home from visiting the Komoeties once he has grown up, he finds that Elias has been on the receiving end of an elephant’s fury. The injury Elias suffered is a metaphor for bitterness and hatred. Elias is an angry, jealous, hateful man, and he keeps all of that ugliness inside, and then speaks it. However, once the elephant has attacked him, that ugliness is shown on the outside, visible to everyone before he even speaks. The elephants also have a loving, kind familial structure: “‘First they pushed the one in front up until he got a foothold…Each one, as it got to the other side, turned round and helped the next one up by the trunk’” (44-45). Another example of anthropomorphism, the elephants treat one another as most humans treat their families: they love and help one another, to make sure that everyone is okay.
At first it can seem as though the ostriches and elephants symbolize the families, though at other times, it doesn’t seem that way at all. In some ways, they do: “‘You’re lying, you’re like Kicker, you don’t even look up’” (38). Fiela compared her husband, Selling, to Kicker using a simile; neither Selling nor Kicker find any interest in watching the female ostrich. Also like Pollie and Kicker, Elias and Barta don’t care much for one another, either: “‘What about the blanket, Elias?… It’s just that we are so short of blankets, Elias’” (53). Barta doesn’t seem to care much at all about the fact that her husband experienced a near-death experience with one of the things he seems to be most afraid of. Instead, she concerns herself with his failures, such as the blanket that he lost when he was running away. However, the actions of the ostriches and elephants also point out some of the family dynamics, showing the animals to be foil characters. The elephants and their familial structure highlight the lack of familial structure with the van Rooyens: “‘I see your second son is with Soois’s team’… ‘It’s no use all of us cooking in the same pot’” (49). Elias’ second son is working on logging with another family, rather than with his own. Elias explains this by saying that they don’t all need to be working in the same place, as though it wasn’t a big deal that his own son chose another family over his family. Elias also doesn’t care much for his daughter, Nina: “‘What if the bigfeet trample me, Pa?’ ‘I didn’t tell you to…bloody arses!’” (280). Nina is afraid of the bigfeet, but her father disregards her fears, and all but tells her to “deal with it.” There is very little love in the family, although they all secretly desire love. Nina, even, daydreams about the love of a family, and looks to the elephants for satisfaction: “‘Then the other elephants came and stood in a circle…on his little feet between his mother’s legs. It was sweet’” (205-206). Despite her fears of the elephants, Nina desires the love and acceptance of a family. The elephants act like family, which is foreign to her. She becomes excited when talking about them and loves how they treat each other: like the Komoeties treat one another. The Komoeties care about one another and act like a family, which is pointed out by the actions of the ostriches, and the reactions of the family. Fiela is protective of her family- unlike most families in this time period, she is the head of the house, looking after everyone. She is willing to do anything if it means she can protect her family: “‘Had you kicked open my child yesterday, I would have wrung your neck for you!’” (56). Fiela has spent a lot of time and money on Pollie, and still, Pollie almost hurt Fiela’s child. As previously stated, Fiela is very protective. She was not telling Pollie that she would have wrung her neck just because she’s angry and stressed; she is telling Pollie that because she is serious, and feels the same way towards the census men, though she couldn’t say it to them. Pollie also has strange reactions to things, calling attention to the Komoeties’ reactions: “When they drove away, Wolwekraal came to a dismal standstill. Except Pollie” (66). After the census men leave in their car, a dark mood has set on the Komoetie household, because they were just made aware that they could lose Benjamin for good. However, Pollie does not settle with the dark mood. Instead, she is active,and stands out from the norm. This simply headlines the reaction of the Komoeties, exhibiting the darkness and solemness of the situation at hand.
Other animals played a role very similar to that of minor characters: although they appear very few times, they still highlight some family values as well as some common themes and characteristics of the two families. The spider that killed Dawid, for example: “…Wednesday morning, as cheerful as ever, but that night he was a corpse. Button spider. Must have been in the sheaves he had been stacking” (234). The spider is symbolic of death, its bite a metaphor for the loss of hope. The Komoeties have lost much in their experiences, but they have also gained- one of the themes in the novel is loss, and the mortal loss of Dawid was immense, especially after the physical loss of Benjamin. Another of the minor animals is the skunk; there is repetition to express Elias’ anger once Lukas returns home: “‘Skunk!’ The word came from the mangled body… ‘Skunk!’… ‘Skunk!’” (320-321).The repeated reference to Lukas being a skunk is Elias’ way of dealing with his anger and jealousy towards the elephants. Skunks have a negative connotation, because they stink when they are scared, and Elias feels that that is what Lukas did when he left.
Ostriches and elephants alike establish views on the Komoetie and van Rooyen families- some positive, some negative, some solely a fact about the family. The animals relate to the characters through anthropomorphism, and through symbolism and metaphors. Though Kicker, Pollie, and the bigfeet are not human, the two families treat them as such, and compare themselves to the animals, as well. The ostriches and elephants in Fiela’s Child represent the van Rooyen and Komoetie families in that they both compare and contrast to the families, highlighting the family dynamics.
In Plato’s The Symposium, Plato details the events of a dinner party, a symposium for which the work derives its namesake, comprised of a group of seemingly well-educated individuals. Plato […]
“But the chief end I propose to my self in all my labors is to vex the world”Jonathan Swift In most ironic works there are two voices. Ellen Winner and […]
A lifetime of self-hatred that refuses to heal. Friendships based around jealousy or pity, hating or needing each friend because of how wide or narrow you look when standing next […]
The 2007 movie Juno raises many ethical issues through the perspective of Juno, a sixteen-year-old girl who becomes pregnant in high school. The movie is based around the moral struggles […]
Throughout The Rise and Fall of Little Voice, Cartwright presents the character of Mari Hoff as irresponsible and vulgar, especially through his use of colloquial language. Scene Seven certainly supports […]
During the Middle Ages, the connection between animals—or “beasts,” as they were so often referred to—and humans were often blurred, confused, and complicated overall. This state of uncertainty creates much […]
Elizabeth BishopPink Dog (Rio de Janeiro) The sun is blazing and the sky is blue. Umbrellas clothe the beach in every hue. Naked, you trot across the avenue. Oh, never […]
Aristotle dedicates the first book of Politics to discuss households, and argues that to study the larger political community of a city-state, we need to first examine households as its […]
Waiting for Godot is a play characterized under the genre of The Theatre of the Absurd, where communication is said to collapse and thus the dialogue consists of meaningless phrases […]
In Fiela’s Child, the two families, the van Rooyens and the Komoeties, have a strong connection with animals, albeit not always a positive connection. The van Rooyens have a problem […]