Body Cameras Can Provide Truthful Evidence In Judicial Cases
“Any officer who is doing the right thing on a daily basis would want to have a camera on them” (Siegel). Ever since the Ferguson, Missouri incident, when an unarmed African American man was shot by police officer Darren Wilson, the issue has been raised that body cameras should be used by officers to record what an officer faces daily and how they handle every situation. “By 2015, 95 percent of large police departments reported they were using body cameras or had committed to do so in the near future” (Ripley).
A police body camera is defined by Merriam-Webster as, “A video camera that is worn on clothing and used to continuously record activity in front of the wearer.” Body cameras provide citizens the opportunity to view what an officer sees when facing a life or death decision. This paper argues in favor of body cameras. The objective is to show that cameras are: reliable, easily accessible, and a tremendous asset to the law enforcement community.
On August 9, 2014, in Ferguson, Missouri, a young African American man named Michael Brown was walking with a friend down his neighborhood street when a police officer on patrol intercepted them after receiving a call about a robbery that took place nearby. The situation escalated, and the officer shot the unarmed Michael Brown who would eventually pass away from his wounds. The police officer had nobody camera. This event led to revolts and protests around the world against police officers. Many in the public criticized how law enforcement handles the situation. Tom Jackson, the Police Chief of Ferguson, Missouri said, “Body cameras would have made a difference in the investigation of Brown’s shooting.” President Barrack Obama responded by issuing a plea for officers to use body-worn cameras on December 2, 2014. He said, “The problem is not just a Ferguson problem. It’s an American problem” (Korte). After the president’s response, it was granted that some police stations would be provided with cameras and training from the government.
Recently on the news, viewers have observed how video evidence provides the “inside story.” Unfortunately, not all officers have the advantage of owning a body camera. Body cameras must be provided to all officers serving their communities so they may document the police effort to ensure a safer environment.
Body cameras have been shown to provide solid evidence in defending or prosecuting. Body cameras allow the jury to view the entire story without “evidence tampering”. A body camera can help prove both sides of the story. Some citizens, though, believe that a body camera is an invasion of their privacy. There are some who do believe that the cameras will never accomplish the goal of helping and providing a safer atmosphere in the community. Even though officers are wearing the cameras, they can still do something that they are not supposed to do. Body cameras also come with a high monetary cost. Kern County Sheriff Sgt. Ian Chandler said, “It’s extremely expensive” (Kotowski). Police stations could have to pay a lot of money for something that could be used improperly by their officers. The recent events that have been televised showing the urgency on the matter, however. School shootings, suicides, reckless driving, and terror threats are real. Police officers all need to have body cameras for five reasons: Body cameras provide truthful evidence in judicial cases, Body cameras reduce the crime rate, Body cameras are better than other recording devices, Body camera footage can be used for training purposes for officers, and Body Cameras, in general, are just highly favored by officers.
The first reason officers should have body cameras is that body cameras can provide truthful evidence in judicial cases.
The American political system is defined by two basic ocuments, the Declaration of Independence of 1776 and the Constitution of 1789 which forms the US federal government. The Declaration of […]
When I was in first grade, Barack Obama was elected as the 44th President of the United States. The week leading up to his Inauguration, my parents were unusually excited. […]
The political parties that are present in our current governmental institution are made up of the Republican Party the Democratic Party. Each party is passionate in their own beliefs and […]
One of the more prominent environmental documentaries of the last decade, “Before the Flood” introduces many realities facing the conversation of climate change and ecological preservation. Leonardo DiCaprio uses his […]
Choose an example of a successful leader from the public/political or private sphere; and explain why s/he is a good example of leadership personified. Support your claim and bolster your […]
Americanah– ISU Part 2 (Plot Summary) Pg. 1 Ifemelu speaks without the fake accent for the first time when taking a train to Aunty Uju’s house. While on the train […]
How big is the US National Debt and history? By definition, the amount of money owed by the federal government to creditors is referred to as the US National Debt. […]
An investigation into the rhetorical devices and language features used by Barack Obama in his acceptance speech to assert power and to influence peoples’ thoughts Barack Obama is a name […]
Life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievementJames Truslow Adamis, 1931Equal opportunity means similar treatment of all people. This […]
“Any officer who is doing the right thing on a daily basis would want to have a camera on them” (Siegel). Ever since the Ferguson, Missouri incident, when an unarmed […]