About The Story of an Hour

In the Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin the main character is a woman who suffers from heart trouble and whor’s in deep suffering, named Mrs Mallard. When this woman is told about her husbandr’s death she was initially emotional, and with knowing his death she reaped freedom and became filled with joy, and perhaps too much of it which swept her away.. Throughout this short story Kate Chopin, the author of The Story of an Hour portrays a lot of Feminist Criticism, defined as the literary analysis that arises from viewpoint of feminism, feminist theory and/or feminist politics.

Which to this type of criticism occurred in the late nineteenth century right in the Mallards home.

A critical feminist analysis of But when she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely (Chopin 146). Itr’s as if sher’s saying how oppressed she had been all her life, and now that she knows about her soon to be ever reaching freedom and happiness, sher’s ecstatic. Then she goes on saying how There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow creature (Chopin 146). Mrs. Mallard did not want anyone controlling over her which in this case, was her husband. Instead she wanted her free will of being able to do what she felt like doing without anyone stopping her from doing it. Because of her oppressor she had to live her life as that. So when she finds out that he was announced supposedly dead because of an accident, all of a sudden she feels a sense of being free from any male oppression to which she had been a victim of since the day she and her husband exchanged vows. Mrs. Mallard was ready to live for herself and all on her own without having to live for her husband.

When Mrs. Mallard said it over and over under her breath– free, free, free(Chopin 146) she portrays a way of being or saying how she was so powerless before, but is now capable of doing something new now that sher’s not being empowered by anyone. Then When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease–of the joy that kills (Chopin 147). The heart problem mentioned earlier comes into place, and ironically, everyone thinks she died for the opposite reason from the truth. This woman who thought she was free learns that she will be under a man again, and simply cant take it. Therefore her spirit had sunk in again to her reality which unfortunately had hit her too hard when finding out that shed still be trapped into that same marriage. At this moment some would assume that she was so happy to see her husband alive and perhaps have died of such shock while seeing him there standing. But readers know the major outcome or reason for her shock, because the dream she had of the future with feeling powerful and free all sorts of days that would be her own (Chopin 147) would now be impossible for her to live and enjoy.

Louise was given as an example of what a woman suffering in a marriage was like, a wife who was not allowed her own identity nor freedom. Although The Story of an Hour may be a fiction story, it speaks loud and clearly about the feminist criticism women would feel in the 19th century. Having this criticism can help understand the story by knowing that some women would actually in reality go through this type of marriage within this century.

Analysis of The Story of An hour

No woman or man hasnt fallen in love before. It every man and woman desire to be together and cant wait for the moment that can happen. Most of them think that because they don’t know the consequences after that happen.

The idea of love blind their minds and cant see any further and foresee the products of marriage. It is still the same without any development and the consequences usually are predicted. Kate Chopin, in the of an hour the death of the husband and his wife got affected by that to symbolize the control of marriage over women.

Mrs. Louise Mallard is a wife with a heart attack who discovers her husband death in a bus disaster. The heart attack she has could represent the suffrage and stress she is experiencing from that marriage. When she heard the news of his death she was sad and started to cry like any woman would do for her dead husband. “She wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment, in her sister’s arms. When the storm of grief had spent itself she went away to her room alone.(Chopin B). The story starts to be more valuable when she went to her room and started to look through the window. The setting begins to explain the excitement of her feelings and the effects they have over her. She could see in the open square before her house the tops of trees that were all aquiver with the new spring life.” (Chopin A). The use of spring express the rebirth and hope.

She starts to have new feelings that were unfamiliar with her while she was looking through the window.
Mrs. Louise felt that consequences after many years of marriage between her and her husband. Barbara Ewell adds that love has been, for Louise and others, the primary purpose of life, but through new perspective, she comprehends that ?love, the unsolved mystery counts for very little. . . . (Q and A). Her perspective on love had changed since her marriage. She discovered that love wasnt what she expected it to be. She understood love as her only reason to live and it doesn’t count for much. Her husband have the ultimate control over her like being in jail where she will not be freed until he die then she can truly enjoy her independence.

She said it over and over under breath: free, free, free! The vacant stare of terror that had followed it went from her eyes. (Chopin B). Mrs. Louise is now more happy and have great enthusiasm as she is examining the joy of freedom. The idea of starting a new life and being an independent woman with no control, limits or duties what led to her enthusiasm. Even though she loved him sometimes, but in a proposal she didnt really wanted to marry him. Finally, when he showed up again and for her freedom to be gone by that speed really shocked her to the limits of dying immediately.

The sadness that Mrs. Louise had when she heard of her husband death changed into joy quickly after she recognized that she could be free and independent for the rest of her life.

The Story of an Hour reflects Chopinr’s view of the repressive role that marriage played in womenr’s lives as the protagonist, Louise Mallard, feels immense freedom only when her husband has died. Kate Chopin wants to clarify for the readers that not all women desire to live their lives traditionally.

New Life Chopin Story of An Hour

The Story of An Hour Story by Chopin the setting was in 1880r’s which effects many of the events in plots. During this period women especially, in upper middle class and first class was house wives and stay at home mothers, with this role the woman is expected to care for her husband, child(ren) and house. If woman wants to exit a marriage because they have fell out of love for them, her husband was caught cheating on her, or their husband is being abusive to hers.

She cannot divorce him. Only the husband can order a divorce on their marriage if he wish and if he was rich since divorce papers was costly back when. Another way a woman can get out of a marriage is if her husband dies. Which is how Louise Mallard got out of her marriage. After her husband Richards Mallard was reported dead after a train accident, because of the accident Louise was finally able to exit her marriage and she can start a new life. Having a fresh new start without worrying about making caring for her husband and making sure he is happy. Richard being dead also means that Louise is not mental prisoner anymore since she was trapped in a marriage with a man who she barely loved. She had a new life for an hour after her husband died.

One reason the story talks on how she sat in front of square window in a spring day (Chopin 398). During the spring season she see plants and animals coming out of hibernate, and when many animals have their offspring. Spring also symbolism: reborn, a new life and begin, a fresh start and renewal. Spring is an important part of the story since Mrs. Mallard started off crying in her room when she found out husband died before she realized she was finally free. During this scene the author showed how the weather was transitioning from a spring shower to the sun trying to shine in the sky which is found in showing Mrs. Mallard changed feeling she may had been having at this point and foreshowing the fact her husband is not truly dead, ruining her chances of a new life (Chopin 398). Also in Chopin said: She had felt it, creep out the sky reaching toward her though the sounds, scents, the colors that filed the air (Chopin 398). This show her realizing she is finally able to begin a new life, like how nature is renewing itself and any animals gives new life and plant begins to grow again.

The next reason, after crying for a few minutes she began to whisper free (Chopin 399) she slowly realizes she was not married to a Mr. Mallard a man who thought of who she only at certain times and will description as an old man whom she viewed as old and boring. Mrs. Mallard whisper: Free! body and soul free! (Chopin. 399) this showed that she was excited or relived that she can finally live a free from Mr. Mallard free she does not have to listen her husband whenever he asks or tell her to do something. She does have to care for him by making sure she cooked for him every day, cleaning his clothes and ironing them. She does not have worry about making sure he is happy or pleased, anymore. She is completely free form he formerly life, she now life a stress-free life. Once her sister had got her out of her room Louise was described having a feverish triumph in her eyes and carried herself unwittingly like a goddess which showed us filly accept to fact her husband died, and she free to started a new life with a different kind of freedom (Chopin 399).

Lastly at the end of story, Mrs. Mallard died after seeing her husband. the doctor believes her heart disease had caused her death, and source which cause heart disease to flame up and make her die was joy (Chopin 400) from seeing her husband who turned did not dead in the train accident. I believed she died when she realized all her hopes and dreams of her new life without her husband Mr. Mallard. Richard standing at the bottom of the stairs and looking at her (Chopin 399) which symbolism her dreams and hopes going from under her. Once she saw her husband it was like a bullet want thought her heart, since she never lives the life she been thinking up for the last hour. Her freedom and dreams were completely gone once she saw her husband since none of her plans for future was with him. Louise had breath a quick prayer hoping that might be long before she left the room with Josephine in since, they were foreshadowing that Richard, not her future of happy spring and summer days not married (Chopin 399). Considering that many people only will only pray if they are in hard times or feel like something bad may happens. If Louise truly felt freed at that time the author would have most likely said she thanked god or said her graces.

In conclusion, Mrs. Mallard had a new life for an hour. She now able to be free. the season spring had shown her she is able to have a fresh started of life. All this was shatter once she saw her husband. Since all her hopes and dreams about her life was gone as soon her husband.

The Feminist Perspective to Analyze The Story of an Hour

Knowing that Mrs.Mallard was afflicted with a heart trouble, great care was taken to break to her as gently as possible the news of her husband’s death.
This, the opening sentence of the story, is the base and premise upon which the rest of the story is built on. In the ensuing course of events the tragic irony of this line is revealed. The Story of an Hour, Written by Kate Chopin – a woman and classical feminist author in every sense of the label – depicts a young housewife by the name of Mrs.Mallard who has just learned that her husband has died in a train accident.

Much to the reader’s likely surprise, Mrs.Mallard is not heartbroken, but is actually happy, stating But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely.. When analyzed through the various lenses of the Feminist perspective, specifically those that state that works of art created by women often have different perspectives, and that works authored by men frequently reinforce patriarchal views of women, the main theme of the story becomes clear: both women and men are both oppressed within the social constructs of marriage and similar heterosexual relationships.

Feminist analysis shows that Chopin used the idea that works written by women often have unique depictions of women in order to circumvent the readers expectations for the story and open them up to the main theme of the story.

When Mrs.Mallard is demonstrably happy at the news of her husband’s death, it’s not because she hates her husband, this is obvious when she says She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death , it’s because she’s overjoyed at the idea that she would be free from the repression of her marriage, as clear when she says There would be no one to live for during those coming years; she would live for herself.. This reveals that Mrs.Mallard isn’t happy within her marriage because she feels trapped, which falls out of the typical standards of romance in many works of media written by men – it’s an idea at the time that only a woman would express. This helps to construct the main theme: that marriage is a curse on it’s participants, particularly women.

Further analysis from the feminist perspective shows that the author used the idea that works created by men often (unconsciously or consciously) reinforce the standard patriarchal stereotypes of women to expand on the theme of marriages becoming stifling to the participants. This is done by contradicting what is often expected of women in media. Women are expected to be content in their relationships and to happily allow men to control their lives – Mrs.Mallard is not. This is evident in the text when she expresses her joy at having …no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence , she is only content when she is finally free. This is also supported when Mrs.Mallard’s sister thinks she is harming herself out of sadness, when ironically she’s happily celebrating her newfound freedom, as obvious to the readers when she answers her sister by saying ?Go away. I am not making myself ill. This divergence from the standard patriarchal concepts of womanhood helps to convey the idea that when men create media, they reinforce patriarchal concepts, as well as implying that many men don’t really know (or worse, care) about what women want and need in relationships. This supports the theme of the story, that relationships in the heterosexual sense are often bad for women.

Using the feminist perspective to analyze The Story of an Hour reveals that women are often oppressed when in relationships. The central character of the story, Mrs.Mallard, is both an example of how a female character can be written better and more believably when written by a female, and also a contradiction of how many female characters are often written by men. Mrs.Mallard is not content with her marriage and often feels trapped by it. Tragically, her heart trouble, which her sister thought might kill her once Mrs.Mallard found out about her husband’s death, ironically killed her once it was revealed that he was alive.

This reveals that Chopin believes that marriages are traps for restraining women. She wants to send the message that if marriage as a concept is to be saved, it must be reformed to better benefit both participants.

The Main Themes of The Story Of An Hour

Kate Chopin, the only child of 5 to survive into adulthood. Her piece The Story of an Hour can be perceived in different ways. It is just as the title describes, a story that occurs within the span of an hour.

One could regard it as just a return from death stories and forget about it. However, this short story has a much more in depth meaning and attempts to make a statement about women’s rights and maybe even humanity. In most cases death ensues grief or sorrow whereas in this story, death brings a mixture of those along with jubilation and a sense of newfound independence. Kate Chopin made the heroine of the story Louise portray how marriage can be confining and something like enslaving or a form of servitude rather than being a mutually loving partnership.

Mr. Mallard our heroiner’s husband is believed to have died from a railroad crash which we can equate this to change in life or the act of moving on. Through his death, his wife would be transitioning from being a wife to being an individual with goals and aspirations. The story opens with the author making known that Mrs.Mallard’s heart trouble will play a role in the story and her sister felt that because of this, relaying the news of her husbandr’s death had to be taken with great caution. Upon discovering the news, she understandably begins to cry and grieve in her room as she requests to be alone. Grief turns to reflection as she looks back on her life, and the reality of a new life without her husband present begins to settle in. Louise feels this overbearing feeling building up though she tries to fight it, she is aware of its presence. The feeling is far from grief as to be expected, but happiness for the new freedom that has been seemingly bestowed upon her. Chopin describes the emotions of Louise and there is a variance in the language used. We see this in the quote And yet she loved him-sometimes. Often she did not showing how indifferent her emotions are in contrast to where her true feelings are seen through change in language. The simple statement above is stunted by What did it matter! What could love, the unsolved mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being! When the emotions Louise experiences become stronger, the syntax and diction changes.

She ponders over the funeral day and knows that shell be brought to tears but for reason other than sadness. The bondage she feels marriage brings is for both men and women and she attempts to shut out the fact that she had feelings for her husband and through this we start to wonder just how sad this marriage really was. We can infer that Louise is an older women from the statement earlier in the story describing her as having a fair calm face with lines projecting repression. We later come to see that as being incorrect, the lines Chopin speaks of are a result of Louiser’s unhappiness with her marriage as well as possibly her heart condition. She attempts to bite back the words Free! Free! Free! (Chopin 4), however, in doing so she also seems content doing so. The death of her husband seemed to be seen as freedom of being under the rule of another and even freedom from a man she did not fully love. We dont know her first name at the beginning of the story and as the story progresses and t is revealed, we can see that Chopin does this in an attempt to show Louise trying to regain her identity lost upon marriage. Thinking on the time, wives of the latter part of 19th century were legally tied to their husbands will. However, widows did not bear the same obligations and had more recognition and thus, more of a handle on their lives. Regardless of how good of a husband Brently Mallard was to his wife, Chopin suggested that any relationship presents some limitation whether intentional or not.

Mrs. Mallard looks outside her window and sees the trees with new life as spring approaches. All her eyes can see from the window are signs of new life which is worded very effectively as spring is equated with a sign of rebirth and renewal and her husband died around this time of year. In the statement that she would live for herself only in the coming years, Chopin suggests that the life she was living before was one in which her husband wanted for her rather than how she wanted to live.

Critical Analysis of Mrs. Mallard

Culture teaches us that our existence is a mere reflection of what already exists. In Kate Chopinr’s The Story of an Hour epitomizes the plight of women in the 19th century, as well as in the present day. Women frequently lived in loveless marriages where they were thought of more as commodities than as people.

Additionally, Kate Chopin mirrors a reflection of society to show that women were not happy with the oppressive and submissive gender roles of 1890r’s society. In the short story the character Mrs. Mallard could be said to represent women of her time period who were unable to find happiness in marriage and motherhood, not because itr’s not found there, but because their freedom within marriage are restricted. Louise Mallard experiences what people in society today long for throughout their lives in relationships, freedom and happiness.

Furthermore, immediately after the news of her husbandr’s death, Mrs. Mallard races upstairs into her bedroom where she settles into a comfortable, roomy armchair (para. 4). The armchair symbolizes the rest from the oppressive life she had and freedom from societyr’s expectations. Since it is tradition for women to be married by a certain age, Louise Mallard must have obligated to marry her husband Brently. Chopin suggests that all marriages, even the kindest ones, are inherently oppressive.

During the 1890r’s, women were owned by their husbands and had little to no control over their own live. Evidence of how little control women had over their lives can be found in the line from the story that reads, There would be no one to live for in those coming years; she would live for herself. Mrs. Mallard clearly has no hope for any independence or free will as long as her husband is alive. She admits that her husband wasnt really cruel to her but even if he’s kind, even if he means well, he still has the power in the relationship. Therefore, the wife is always the lesser party. She must always bend to his will, she must live for him rather than for herself. A feminist critique shows how marriage does not allow for Mrs. Mallard to feel and sense of freedom or individuality. Bringing this inequality between genders to the forefront is one of the main goals of feminist literary criticism.

Chopin shows through Louise Mallardr’s musings that marriage where one person has more control than the other can make it harder for couples to love each other, because even though Mrs. Mallard feels for husband, her desire for her freedom is stronger. Even though this is years ago the same situations still occur today. The flaw in the marriage of the Mallards was definitely classified as an imperfection of life. It is very unfortunate that marriages have to be that way. In the time of the Realism period the marriages went wrong because the man thought he was superior to the women. Mrs. Mallard mirrors a reflection of womenr’s independence who dream of getting out of the role playing Im just a wife.