Superficial Values in Revolutionary Road

When colonial settlers arrived in North America on the Mayflower in 1620, the primary concern of the newly established society was to ensure survival; however, nowadays, Western consumer society has placed a significant emphasis on shallow ideals, particularly the worth of outward appearance. Over the past few centuries, society, particularly in the West, has transformed from being concerned with life preservation to being concerned with extraneous superficial values such as those that focus on material objects and physical appearance. Advertisements run rampant, indoctrinating girls into believing they need to use makeup to “look pretty,” brainwashing boys into believing they need to “bulk up” with muscle. Richard Yate’s novel Revolutionary Road tackles the existence of superficial values in society. Aesthetic appearance provides Frank Wheeler with a false sense of confidence exemplified by the contrasts between the states of clothed and bare, imagined and real, and practiced and natural.

The contrast between Frank Wheeler’s clothed and bare states illustrates the false sense of confidence physical appearance provides him. As Frank awakes early in the morning, undressed for the day, he considers:

He planned, as soon as he’d had some coffee, to get dressed and go out and take the lawnmower away from her [April], by force if necessary, in order to restore as much balance to the morning as possible. But he was still in his bathrobe, unshaven and fumbling at the knobs of electric… For a second he thought of hiding, but it was too late. She [Mrs. Givings] had already seen him through the screen door… He was caught. He had to open the door and stand there in an attitude of welcome. (Yates 41)

In Frank’s unclothed state, he lacks confidence and power. In Western culture, mowing the lawn is typically a masculine responsibility that falls to a male figure in the house. However, while Frank is bare in his bathrobe, April, a woman, is mowing the lawn, taking over Frank’s masculine duty as head of the house. Frank, in his unclothed state, does not have the authority to restore “balance to the morning” by taking the lawnmower from April and realizing his masculine obligation. In essence, Frank feels inadequate to exert power over even a female, those who are generally seen as submissive and weak, at least until he puts on clothes. Furthermore, Frank states the “balance to the morning” is disrupted, which illustrates the fact that he feels insufficient and insecure; in a conventional or “balanced” relationship, April would play the role of a submissive housewife. However, Frank is literally conceding that, in his bare state, April stands higher on the continuum of power, tipping that of an orthodox relationship, creating an unbalance or dilemma. Frank understands the solution to this problem is to confiscate the lawnmower and assume masculine responsibility, but he cannot derive the confidence to do so until he his clothed. Frank is awkward and clumsy in his bare state, “fumbling” around in a fit of incoordination, a description not indicative of a confident individual. Additionally, Frank displays shame and apprehension over his unclothed state; Frank feels he must resort to “hiding” from Mrs. Givings. He does not even have the conviction to stand and welcome a family friend. When Mrs. Givings sees Frank unchanged, he believes himself to be “caught,” as if his true, unconfident nature has been exposed. Being found inadequately clothed serves as a metaphor for being found out. Frank feels that Mrs. Givings has discovered his ‘dirty little secret’ that Frank is not truly a confident and powerful individual, but rather his frame of mind is dependent on his outward appearance. Furthermore, Frank is afraid that Mrs. Givings realizes that while Frank is in his ‘bare’ state April, who is still continuing to mow the lawn, wears the pants in the relationship, is more powerful than Frank. Frank holds a preconceived notion that clothing will give him confidence and authority. As soon as Frank is “dressed,” he feels he will have the mental vigor to “take” back the lawnmower, painting a much more confident and strong personality. In fact, he is prepared to use “force if necessary.” By putting on clothes, Frank will not only have the mental confidence to reinstate his masculinity, but also the physical strength to exercise it via force. Thus, in a broader sense, clothes act as a metaphor for fakeness or personal fabrication. Frank displays that putting on clothes, adding to his physical appearance, provides him with a false sense of confidence that is not present in his bare state.

The juxtaposition between Frank’s imagined and realized self further demonstrates the superficial sense of arrogance physical aesthetics afford him. Frank reflects while staring into a mirror:

“He looked at himself in the mirror, tightening his jaw and turning his head a little to one side to give it a leaner, more commanding look, the face he had given himself in mirrors since boyhood and which no photograph had ever quite achieved” (Yates 16).

A photograph is a snapshot image of a particular moment, one that captures an accurate and realized representation of a certain individual or scene. Frank feels that “no photograph had ever quite achieved” his mental expectations and visualizations of self. Thus, Frank is unhappy and lacking confidence in his realized self, alluding to his true nature. The mirror also provides Frank with a realized duplicate of himself: a mirror is a reflective surface that spits back a clear illustration of an individual. Frank, however, is troubled with this portrait, evidenced by the fact that he feels the need to change the reflected image. By turning his face and tightening his jaw, Frank is turning to a favorable imagined depiction of his physical appearance. Frank visualizes himself as “leaner,” a condition with connotations of good health and good looks. Frank is simply not content with the way he looks naturally in the mirror, but rather feels the need to activate his imagination in order to feed into his narcissistic desires, to analyze his own ‘beauty.’ The process of distorting his face in the mirror to appear better looking provides Frank with false self-reassurance, illustrating the role physical appearance plays in altering his mental state. Furthermore, Frank’s imagined self is “more commanding.” One who is commanding is a masculine embodiment of strength and arrogance, ordering others to act in a certain manner. After Frank distorts the mirror picture, he considers himself “more commanding,” indicating a change of a personality, when in reality, the only change that occurred was an imagined one of physical appearance. This change in attitude shows that Frank’s traits are not genuine, but rather derived from the way that he looks and are flexible to change depending on how he imagines himself. Thus, the contrast between Frank’s realized unconfident self and his imagined, better looking, more powerful self reveals the phony sense of confidence physical appearance can provide.

Additionally, the contrast between Frank’s practiced and natural versions of himself displays the artificial confidence external appearance offers the character. Frank falls deep into thought over a cigarette:

When he lit a cigarette in the dark he was careful to arrange his features in a virile frown before striking and cupping the flame (he knew, from having practiced this at the mirror of a blacked-out bathroom years ago, that it made a swift, intensely dramatic portrait), and he paid scrupulous attention to endless detail; keeping his voice low and resonant, keeping his hair brushed and his bitten nails out of sight; being always the first athletically up and out of bed in the morning, so that she might never see the face lying swollen and hopeless in sleep. (Yates 231)

The word “morning” has general connotations of birth and natural existence. Frank, in the morning, is described with a “swollen” face. Thus, in his natural form, Frank is beaten and his face disfigured, physical indications of a low natural self-confidence. While sleeping, one of the few times Frank is not able to overpower his natural self with his practiced version, Frank is described as “hopeless.” Frank’s natural self is one that is met with despair and shame, hopeless and powerless. Frank, however, enacts a practiced version of himself in order to mask his true insecurity. “Careful to arrange” his features, Frank is meticulous in keeping his practiced version aesthetically pleasant, paying constant “scrupulous attention” to little details in order to keep this façade of appearance together. This habit requires constant attention and energy at the cost of his sanity. Frank has “bitten nails,” a common sign of stress relief, likely as a result from the strain he feels from trying to constantly maintain a groomed appearance; it can be reasonably inferred that keeping up the charade of a perfect appearance is so mentally consuming that it drives him to bite his nails in order to relieve stress. In practice, Frank habitually keeps the one part of his body that accurately represents his natural self, his “bitten nails,” out of sight. His groomed version is hiding his imperfect and tense natural self, represented by the hiding of the bitten nails. Frank’s attempts to hide his natural self-defects via his practiced appearance shows that he is truly insecure, and that any confidence he does hold comes from his outward appearance, not his true nature. The physical appearance of Frank’s practiced self provides him with an undeserved sense of confidence. Words such as “cigarette,” “frown,” “striking” and “flame” all have implications concerning a certain sense of masculine confidence. Furthermore, Frank is controlling his voice to keep it “low and resonant,” like that of a booming and powerful man. In addition, Frank “athletically” arises in the morning, excited and ready to put forth a coordinated effort to his practiced self into use. The excitement he feels to shed his natural being shows that he is ashamed of his unconfident side, and that the physical appearance of his practiced self provides him with synthetic confidence.

Richard Yates, in the writing of Revolutionary Road, astutely provides social commentary on the superficiality and focus on aesthetics in the 1950s, the so-called “Golden Age of Capitalism.” The 1950s marked the extensive spread of capitalism, turning the West into the largest consumer civilization in the world. With consumer ideals came focus on superfluous and materialistic things that were once irrelevant to everyday life. Physical appearance is one such example. In Revolutionary Road Richard Yates uses Frank as a vehicle to provide his opinion on the matter. Frank is a morally delicate character, whose choices are very questionable. He has no real reason to be a confident man, and, in fact, over the course of the story, he is established as a rather weak character. Yet, physical appearance and focus on the outward and tangible allow him to foster a sense of unwarranted confidence. Put simply, materialism and focus on appearance allow individuals to mask their lack of moral integrity and often-innate weakness with deceptive, skin-deep arrogance. The Mayflower Pilgrims would likely be shocked by the state of Western society, the transformation from values that once held significant meaning, to values with empty and superficial meaning.

A Continuous Metaphor: Theater in Revolutionary Road

Richard Yates’s Revolutionary Road unveils the emptiness of suburban life by incorporating a play into the opening paragraphs and then continuing a metaphor of theater throughout the rest of the novel. The novel opens with theatrical failure that foreshadows the evident downfall of Frank and April’s lives. The book characters take on their own theatrical roles in the suburban setting they are all forced to act in. The theatrical production of the opening chapter becomes an enduring metaphor that starts in the author’s decision to begin the novel with a production of The Petrified Forest, and is fulfilled through the performances of both Frank and April as they strive to act in a way that lines up with their suburban lifestyle.

The Laurel Players presentation of The Petrified Forest juxtaposed with the rest of the novel uncovers the truth of the suburbs. Painfully embarrassing, the cast’s performance becomes difficult to watch. The audience cringes with each passing moment as April attempts to play her part. While acting, April is described as having “lost her grip” causing the audience to all become “embarrassed for her” as “she had begun to alternate between false theatrical gestures and a white-knuckled immobility” (Yates, Revolutionary Road). Her failure at playing her part in the play foreshadows her inability to fulfill her role as a submissive house-wife. Similar to the cast of The Petrified Forest, every character in the novel is reading a “cultural script” given to them by the social interpretation of what life in the suburbs should mirror. Every character in this suburbia follows the same pattern of conformity found in the production of a play. The characters are “painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture” (Yates, Revolutionary Road). They stick to their cultural scripts, never straying away from its guidance.

Additionally, Yates’s choice to have April star in the production of The Petrified Forest becomes a foreshadowing of her restlessness. In both the novel and the play, the characters find rescue from their failure in death. In The Petrified Forest, Alan escapes the torments of his failure through death and Gabby finds freedom in Alan’s life insurance policy as it allows her to begin a new life in Europe. Before his death Alan says, “Living, I’m worth nothing to her. Dead – I can buy her the tallest cathedrals, and golden vineyards, and dancing in the streets” (Sherwood, The Petrified Forest). This mindset is displayed in April’s death as well because she too gave her spouse a way to start fresh. After her death, Frank sent away their kids and finally had the opportunity to unlock his true potential as a man.

April and Frank are either arguing or pretending as if everything is okay when it clearly is not. They lead a life switching between staged events in which they appear to be merely reading a script, or messy arguments that reveal their true flaws in both their marriage and themselves. April finds herself lost in a game of pretend as she tries to be the submissive house wife that she is expected to embody. After Frank’s support for her in her play, she feels as if she owes it to him to be the typical wife he thought he wanted. However, she secretly longs to find a greater purpose for her life outside of the discriminatory definition of being a wife in the suburbs. April is a leading actress, in The Petrified Forest and in the Wheelers’ life on Revolutionary Road, and in both productions she longs for escape. In both her role as a wife to Frank and in The Petrified Forest, April “was working alone, and visibly weakening with every line” (Yates, Revolutionary Road). Sadly, April puts on the greatest performance of her life on the day of her death. On the morning of her botched abortion, she makes one final attempt at performing the role of the submissive house-wife which becomes her most convincing act yet. She appears to be everything her husband could ask for, but little do they realize she is only a few hours from her death.

Frank plays the part of an intellectual. He has himself and others convinced that he is destined for greatness, held back by the confines of the suburbs where his unique talent is going to waste. When given the chance to move to Paris and make something of himself, his true persona is revealed and the character he is playing is called out for being a fraud. April saw Paris as a way that they could redefine themselves, she would be the breadwinner and he would chase his dreams. He looks for a way to get out of the move and finds his rescue in April’s surprise pregnancy. Frank hides behind the person he is pretending to be. His dialogue towards the end of the novel seems to be scripted, further unfolding the play metaphor.

Yates’s use of a continuous metaphor brings depth to the novel that would not exist otherwise. April and Frank act as both characters in a novel and actors in a play. Beginning the novel with a production of The Petrified Forest foreshadows the inevitable fate that the novel’s characters will meet. Though the production is a memorable segment of the novel in its own right, the fate of the Laurel Players also highlights Frank and April’s joint failure at living the suburban life.

Works Cited

Yates, Richard. Revolutionary Road. Klim, 2011. Print.

Sherwood, Robert Emmet. The Petrified Forest: A Play in Three Acts. Dramatists Play Service, Inc., 1962.