Pi, Requiem for a Dream and Black Swan: Obsession in Madness

The American Dream: An idea that every US citizen should have an equal opportunity to achieve success and prosperity through hard work, determination, and initiative (OED). Anyone willing to put in the work can achieve their dreams, but what if these dreams are impossible to achieve. Where is the line between determination and obsession?

Darren Aronofsky incorporates this paradigm into several of his films, and each film serves a separate agenda. Black Swan makes a commentary on the competitive world of ballet through gendered lenses. As the black and white Swan, Nina must embody purity and seduction simultaneously. Pi deals with genius and madness as well as the unfathomable relation between mathematics and religion. Requiem for a Dream follows the lives of four Brooklynites dealing with the downfalls of addiction as they struggle to achieve their dreams.

So, what do a perfectly imperfect ballerina, a sober drug addict, and a mathematician who proves the existence of God through math all have in common? They are all impossible. It would be hardly rash to say that the protagonists didn’t stand a chance. These characters are obsessed with becoming something they never could be in the first place. Darren Aronofsky links madness to obsession in his films Black Swan, Requiem for a Dream and Pi. The subjective lenses of the characters as well as the techniques of cinematic style contribute to the audience’s sense of madness. Aronofsky portrays the protagonist’s internal battle through concrete and abstract characteristics of madness. Aronofsky’s films associate obsession concretely by characterizing protagonists with traits of paranoia and incorporating their point of view to show delusions. Obsession is also shown in abstraction through imagery, music and cinematography. Even further, the imagery in the films brings the audience’s own sanity and perceptions into question. The three films contain parallels that specify the concept of what society thinks of as abnormal obsessive behavior. Contextually, these films interpret the downfalls of obsession within American culture. These modes that connect madness to obsession aren’t problematic but incredibly relevant. They address several cultural problems that are pertinent now more than ever. I shall break down his films Pi, Requiem for a Dream, and Black Swan, comparatively, to address the association of madness and obsession.

In Pi, Max has the delusion that he is a new age messiah and the only human capable of understanding God. His delusions lead to paranoia, albeit it is warranted in parts of the film. His mentor and friend, Sol, ridicules Max’s number theories. “When your mind becomes obsessed with anything, it will filter everything else out and find examples of that thing everywhere” (Pi). For example, Max concludes that “we’re built from spirals, living within a giant spiral, is it possible that all human behavior… is in the form of a spiral” (Pi). He sees spirals in the Stock Market, coffee, smoke, and even the Torah. Poetic? Yes. Valid? Probably not. Like Sol said, Max’s obsession with patterns causes his spiral delusion.

Max’s search for patterns contributes to his intense journey from isolation and obsessiveness to paranoia and insanity (Kulezic-Wilson 20). His paranoia is presented through his actions such as locking his door and looking out his peep hole. Paranoia is presented in a similar form in Sara Goldfarb in Requiem for a Dream. As Max’s delusions worsen as he continues to search for numbers, Sara’s delusions increase as she continues to misuse her dieting pills. The source of her fantasies stems from a dream of fame. “It’s a reason to get up in the morning. It’s a reason to lose weight, to fit in the red dress… it makes tomorrow all right” (Requiem for a Dream). The ‘reason’ is her application to appear on a reality show hosted by Tappy Tibbons. In her fictional world, she has a purpose that she lacked in reality. However, it is her obsession with fame that leads her to abuse drugs. This causes her extreme paranoia; she is tormented by the two major forces in her life: the television and the refrigerator. After taking too many pills one night, Sara imagines herself to be in Tappy’s show. She sees everyone mocking her, yelling “Feed me Sara” as her refrigerator comes to life (Requiem for a Dream).

In Black Swan, obsessive behavior is seen as paranoia and delusions in both Nina and her oppressive mother. Both women have an unnatural obsession with Nina’s perfection. The mother blames her own underachievement as a ballet dancer on having Nina. On one hand she can live through Nina, on the other hand Nina is a rival that cannot do better than she did (Fisher & Jacobs 58). Her mother infantilizes her to preserve her innocence, in a way preventing her from embracing the dark and sexual role of the black swan. Nina is obsessed with her own perfection. Ironically, Nina’s flawless technique is her downfall. “I see you obsess over getting each move exactly right, but I never see you lose yourself” critiques her instructor Leroy (Black Swan). A combination of exhausting practice, poor diet, stress and pressure lead to Nina’s delusions and paranoia. Nina’s paranoia is reflected onto other women, Lily in particular. Nina complained to Leroy that “she’s [Lily] trying to replace me” (Black Swan). Nina’s paranoia is unwarranted and continues to manifest itself as more violent. Her delusions peak during her fight with Lily. Nina sees her as a reflection of herself, and stabs her other self with a shard of glass only to realize her reflection is Lily. Of course, even this is a delusion. Lily never died, Nina stabbed herself (Black Swan). Symbolically, Nina has killed the white swan inside of her. “It’s my turn” is not a reference to Nina, but the black swan inside of her (Black Swan). Her obsession is now fulfilled as she completes the final change into the black swan (seen as both a physiological and a psychological change).

Self-harm and suicide are also prominent connections between obsession and madness in Aronofsky’s films. While it is most obvious in Black Swan and Pi, it can also be seen in the self-destruction of drug use in Requiem for a Dream. In Black Swan, self-harm is gendered toward adolescent women. Nina’s mother recognizes Nina “has been scratching again” and attributes the resurgence of this “disgusting habit” to the stress of ballet (Black Swan). Although her mother is crazed and obsessive in her own right, she has a point. It was Nina’s obsession with ballet that caused her scratch herself till she bled, her obsession with appearance that lead to an eating disorder, and her obsession with perfection willed her to continue her performance despite her injuries, resulting in her death. Her final words were “It was perfect” (Black Swan). Obsession caused Nina to put her dream before her life, a choice we also see in Pi.

“When I was a little kid my mother told me not to stare into the sun. So once, when I was six, I did (Pi). This is Max’s earliest recollections of how his curiosity came back to hurt him. In the film, Max’s curiosity of mathematics causes him to neglect his own hygiene and heath (which is poor to start with). “You [Max] can’t go out like that… You need a mom” (Pi). The audience sees Max’s mania and poor social skills through his interactions with others. The difference between Max’s self and harm and Nina’s is that Max targets his brain as insufficient while Nina targets her body. There is abstract imagery of Max prodding his detached brain, commonly resulting in a bright white light and a high pitched modulation (Pi). At the end of the film, Max literally drills his own brain out, signifying the end of his obsession and his acceptance that the human mind cannot comprehend all the patterns in the universe.

In Requiem for a Dream, the characters harm themselves through the use of drugs, quite often denying the consequences of their actions. In an argument, Harry lectures his mother “what is the big deal? Those pills will kill you before you get on [TV]” (Requiem for a Dream). Sara responds, “I’m somebody now Harry” (Requiem for a Dream). The drug side-affects are apparent, but Sara is willing to ignore them because they are helping her negative self-image as well as her social status with her friends. Harry’s concern is completely hypocritical. Drug obsession is just as much of a problem among him and his friends. The previous conversation also indicates that he knows how drugs can affect health yet chooses to do them anyway. Although Harry, Tyrone, and Marion want to make money selling drugs and sober up, they are constantly pressuring each other to continue using. In this way, addiction hold the same meaning as obsession. Tyrone suggests Harry and he should “take a little taste so we know how much to cut” and Marion argues that they “should dip in now…Tyrone is going to score in the morning” (Requiem for a Dream). Statements like these indicate that they have convinced themselves they aren’t actually addicted; this is similar to Sara’s self-denial about her addiction.

Aside from mental disorders, obsession and madness are linked through ambition and dreams in the films. Dream imagery exists in all the films. Dreams are seen as both physical wants of the characters and well as mental representations during sleep. In some instances, it is hard to discern what is a dream and what is a delusion. Both Black Swan and Requiem for a Dream have dream sequences or references. In Requiem for a Dream, Harry sees an ethereal Marion wearing a red dress and standing on a pier in Coney Island (Requiem for a Dream). In Black Swan, Nina said that she “had the most amazing dream. I was dancing the White Swan” (Black Swan). In Pi, Max doesn’t have dreams, but he does have these vision-states where he places himself in a contrast of all white. These dreams represent unattainable clarity and purity, much like the physical desires of the characters.

“To help actualize their [Tyrone, Harry and Marion] dreams of owning a business, getting off the streets and securing an apartment, they turn to purchasing, cutting, and selling heroine. The ironic rationalization they offer is that if they can save enough money from selling dope they will be able to actualize a world void of drugs. Their obsession with drug use is based on the notion that tomorrow they will give it up” (Moreno 221). The problem with this dream: it is unrealistic. How could a character achieve their dream of sobriety and success if they are selling drugs to get there? For Nina to embrace her role as the black and white swan, she has to be a perfect balance of purity and seduction. “Nina’s default position is that of the white swan: prim, uptight, prissy… she has perfect technique but no feeling, no passion” (Fischer & Jacob 59). No doubt, it appears impossible for a woman to balance these two polar opposite personas at one time. The concept of being perfectly imperfect is also seen in Pi. To know God is far too complicated for any human to comprehend- much less discover Him in a number sequence. Max can only find truth in death and, not surprisingly, the truth is Max doesn’t know the answer. In the last scene-after Max committed suicide- his neighbor asks him to calculate “255 times 183”, and Max responds “I don’t know. What is it?” (Pi).

Obsession is presented in abstract means in the films- in music for example. “The rhythm of visual and sonic repetitions and interactions, audiovisual “phrasing,” the music of Max’s voice-over, the external rhythm of hip-hop editing and its kinetic drive generated by the internal rhythm of the camera work, techno-music, diegetic and nondiegetic sound effects” (Kulezic-Wilson 32). Aronofsky pairs cinematograph with his music and the ongoing action in the films to create a sense of heightened paranoia, all in the attempt to bring the viewer to feel what the character is feeling. The music is also amplified when Max is experiencing mathematical revelation, and the sound often flows in high wave frequencies when Max suffers from migraines. The hip-hop rhythm in Pi and the scores from the other two films evoke a feeling of obsession. It queues the audience in and creates confusion and discomfort. Summarily, the score from Requiem for a Dream, Lux Aeterna, -the only song used in the film- is played at times of moral crisis. Black Swan uses ballet-based piano scores to show Nina’s anxiety and stress. (It is not a surprise that these scores all act in the same way because they were all written by the same composer, Clint Mansell).

Abnormal and disturbing cinematography always accompanies the music and the rising action in the films. Many of the reoccurring patterns in the cinematography reflect the obsession that the characters have. In all three of the films, the eye is a symbol of their obsession. Harry, Marion and Tyrone experience eye dilation when they get high. Nina’s eyes turn bright red when she transforms into the black swan. Additionally, the pattern of drug use accompanies by sound effects are very similar between Pi and Requiem for a Dream. When the characters take drugs, it is shown as repetitive, with multiple differ shots accompanying each action. This repetition is also present in mundane tasks in both films.

Aronofsky uses all these cinematic elements to create a link between the audience and the character. Each film is highly subjective. The audience can see the protagonist’s dreams, desires and delusions. Because of this, the audience’s own sanity comes into question. Repetitive elements, music and actions create a horrifically obsessive atmosphere. We are presented with every little detail of mundanity and every gruesome feature of madness. Aronofsky is not simply linking obsession to madness, but he is proving to us that they are one in the same.

Works Cited

“American Dream.” OED Online. Oxford University Press, September 2016. Web. 14 November 2016.

Aronofsky, Darren, and Hubert Selby. Requiem for a Dream: Screenplay. London: Faber and Faber, 2000. Print.

Aronofsky, Darren, Mark Heyman, Andrés Heinz, John J. McLaughlin, Mike Medavoy, Arnold W. Messer, Brian Oliver, Scott Franklin, Natalie Portman, Vincent Cassel, Mila Kunis, Barbara Hershey, Winona Ryder, Matthew Libatique, Andrew Weisblum, Clint Mansell, Benjamin Millepied, and Peter I. Tchaikovsky. Black Swan. Beverly Hills, CA: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, 2011.

Aronofsky, Darren. π: Screenplay & The Guerilla Diaries. London: Faber & Faber, 1998. Kulezic-Wilson, Danijela. “A Musical Approach to Filmmaking: Hip-Hop and Techno Composing Techniques and Models of Structuring in Darren Aronofsky’s π.” Music and the Moving Image, vol. 1, no. 1, 2008, pp. 19–34. www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/musimoviimag.1.1.0019.

Fisher, Mark, and Amber Jacobs. “Debating Black Swan: Gender and Horror.” Film Quarterly, vol. 65, no. 1, 2011, pp. 58–62. www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/fq.2011.65.1.58.

Moreno, Christopher M. “Body Politics and Spaces of Drug Addiction in Darren Aronofsky’s ‘Requiem for a Dream.’” GeoJournal, vol. 74, no. 3, 2009, pp. 219–226. www.jstor.org/stable/41148331.

Don’t Look into the Sun: Analyzing Darren Aronofsky’s Pi

Years before Black Swan, writer/director Darren Aronofsky exploded across the film universe with his surprisingly low-budget motion picture, Pi. The film is a violently pensive study of the fine line between madness and genius, as well as a warning of the consequences of disregarding human boundaries. Filled to with thoughtful metaphors, extraordinary cinematography, recurring themes, and phenomenal acting, Pi is a chillingly creative success to both the film industry as well as the world of philosophy.A surreal exploration into the brilliantly unhinged mind of math genius Max Cohen, Pi follows Max as he falls victim to an incurable obsession with finding the numerical pattern – or true answer – to the otherwise chaotic universe. Believing that this 216-digit pattern exists in all aspects of the world – in the stock market, in the numerical translation of the Torah, and in the irrational number pi – Max spirals into a deprecating insanity. He becomes utterly obsessed with the thought of understanding life and consequently becomes consumed by this pursuit of the unknowable.Paranoid and reclusive, Max at first seems like the unlikeliest of heroes to any story. Shielded from the rest of the world by three different locks on his cheap apartment door and harboring an involuntary habit of trembling violently around strangers, Max is astoundingly cloistered – to the point of hinting at a social disorder. In fact, it is perhaps this exact reclusion that eventually pushes him into madness. His reluctance to share his knowledge or ability with anyone, including Hasitic Jew Lenny (who wants him for spiritual purposes) and Wall Street investor Marcy (who, similarly, wants Max to predict stock market prices), thrusts him into a fatal attitude of self-importance and greed. His desire to keep the answer to himself drives him to believe that he is the “chosen one”, as he himself claims in the film.Because of this surprising transformation into superiority and haughtiness, it is logical to assume that the elusive 216-digit pattern represents godliness. Not only does Lenny explain the correspondence in Jewish myth (the number is said to be the true name of God), it can be seen in Max’s attitude as he comes closer and closer to discovery. He becomes selfish and arrogant (“I understand it, and I’m going to see it. I was chosen!”) and begins to see himself as an actual god, higher than the rest of the characters for their clear incapability of finding the answer by themselves.However, it is also quickly evident that the pursuit is turning Max into an agonized man both physically and figuratively mutilating his own brain. He falls victim to terrifying hallucinations and becomes mentally unstable. The film depicts several scenes where Max is poking and prodding at a presumable illusion of a brain, illustrating his utterly tortured attempt to find an answer. The mutilation grows in intensity over time, and in the end, he is overwhelmed by the utter weightiness of the knowledge and is pushed into performing a lobotomy on his own brain.The ant, which seems to represent the ultimate number, is also shown several times throughout the movie – always in scenes that emphasize the importance of the pattern. For example, the ant crawls in the mainframe of Max’s supercomputer, Euclid, when it crashes with the 216-digit “bug”, and sits idly on the wall when Max accurately predicts the stock market prices. More importantly, the ant is also frequently shown crawling along the brain. This metaphorical proximity seems to suggest that the knowledge is within reach of the mind – and yet eternally indefinable. The selection of the ant to represent this number is interesting: while the ant is an endlessly common species, it is astonishingly ubiquitous. This demonstrates that, while the number is so clearly able to be discovered, it is its utter simplicity that makes it so impossible to pin down.Max’s hallucinations and insatiable search converge into a vicious cycle of insanity, forcing him into a chillingly maniacal psychosis. A virtually no-budget film, Pi contributes to its exploration of genius and insanity by using a collection of remarkable visuals. Using only high-contrast black-and-white images, the movie seems to bring the audience directly into the insane, surreal abyss of Max Cohen’s incomprehensible mind. At the same time, the clear disparity between black and white seems to continually contrast two opposites throughout the film – madness and sanity, good and evil, revelation and ignorance… and finally, godliness and mortality. Perhaps this thrust into insanity is a warning by a “higher being” to stop Max from trying to accomplish the unachievable – a warning against trying to achieve a godly status, which is exactly what Max is – consciously or subconsciously – attempting to do.“When I was a little kid, my mother told me not to stare into the sun,” Max repeats throughout the film. “So once when I was six, I did.” This line demonstrates better than any other the universal tendency of humans to want to be great – to overstep their boundaries and, consequently, harm themselves by “flying too high.” Max flew too high both in trying to see the sun, and again in trying to find the godly number. Because of those overambitious desires, he suffered agonizing pain and fell to insanity, and was only granted his “divine sight” for a split second. Although humans may be advanced enough to achieve a moment of clarity, the film seems to say, that is our full extent. We are neither gods nor omniscient beings; we are simply human. The philosophy of Laplace’s Demon implies something similar – that only an omniscient being with the knowledge of every position and force in nature can understand the entire universe. We are not those beings. We cannot know the answer.And yet, the line also shows the beauty of overstepping the human boundary: “At first the brightness was overwhelming, but … I kept looking, forcing myself not to blink, and then the brightness began to dissolve. My pupils shrunk to pinholes and everything came into focus and for a moment I understood.” Though Max may have made a mistake in trying to conquer the unconquerable, for one second, he was unattainably blissful. For one split second, he could clearly see the sun and its answers. So was Max truly wrong? Certainly, he was blinded by the sun afterward for his stupidity and disobedience – but ultimately, did it really matter? After all, he had risked everything, and because of it, had seen the sun. He had understood the elusive truth and was able to retain that knowledge in his mind. He had achieved his goal of “knowing.” Was such a desire so wrong? In a way, Max’s tireless inquiry exemplifies the actions of today’s society. Humans are dominated by similar existential desires, constantly using science and philosophy to search for a meaning in life – often destroying the “natural” state of the planet in doing so. Though countless environmentalists criticize this trait of human behavior, we are simply incapable of putting a stop to our investigation – just as Max was. In the end, we are only human. And though we may end up only seeing a fraction of the sun for the rest of our lives, we will continue to try for all eternity – for that is all we can do.