Diagnosing Paul

In the 1905 short story “Paul’s Case”, author Willa Cather leaves the reader to wonder what exactly Paul’s “case” is. Throughout the story, there seems to be clues left behind by Cather as to what Paul’s obstacles are. Some of Cather’s indications of what Paul is dealing with, make it appear as though Paul is suffering from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), and effects of an unresolved Oedipus Complex. These potential factors of Paul’s ambiguous personality are expressed through Paul’s actions. Examples of some of his alarming behavior would be his views on society and his poor decisions towards the very end of the story.

In Willa Cather’s story, “Paul’s Case”, the opening scene starts off with a meeting discussing if Paul, the main character of the story, should be allowed reentry to school following his suspension a week prior. Following the meeting, it comes up that there was something about Paul that no one could directly understand. It comes out that at a very young age, Paul lost his mother. It’s clear that he wouldn’t remember this experience or remember her at all, but there are plenty of direct effects from losing a parent. An effect of losing a parent could be developing Narcissistic Personality Disorder. This disorder can cause a person to feel as if they’re better than those surrounding them and feel like they’re entitled to more than what they have earned. There are many other symptoms of this disorder such as, “Feeling and behaving in socially distressing ways, limiting their ability to function in relationships and other areas of their life, such as work or school… feeling a sense of entitlement — and when not receiving special treatment, one may become impatient or angry. One may insist on having “the best” of everything…” (Mayo Clinic) These examples of NPD are clearly shown in Paul’s arrogant personality. As Paul’s teachers realize they should be easier on him, he is allowed back into school. Following the meeting, Paul goes to his place of work, Carnegie Hall, where he is an usher. Being an usher, seems to be Paul’s calling in life. He appreciates this occupation and admires what he does, to a point where it is slightly alarming. Paul seems to be infatuated by art and theater, “The instruments seemed to free some hilarious and potent spirit within him…He felt a sudden zest of life; the lights danced before his eyes and the concert hall blazed into unimaginable splendor” (Cather). The author’s descriptions of Paul’s euphoric experience express that art is like an escape for him. However, for someone in a disorderly state like Paul, these kinds of escapes aren’t benefiting him. He is already so out of touch with reality, therefore additional delusions won’t aid his distorted view of the world. Following the symphony, he follows a singer from the show to her hotel, he stood outside daydreaming of what it would be like to live a lavish lifestyle like her. His daydreams of this life he believes he should have reflect the possibility of him inhabiting this disorder. This possibility is reflected through his other actions. His actions also reflect possibilities of other issues within Paul.

Willa Cather describes the street Paul’s house is on as “highly respectable”. As Paul heads home, it’s mentioned that Paul feels a shudder of loathing as he heads towards his street. He hates the simplicity of the lives surrounding him, the author describes his views as, “…loathing of respectable beds, of common food, of a house penetrated by kitchen odors; a shuddering repulsion for the flavorless, colorless mass of every-day existence; a morbid desire for cool things and soft lights and fresh flowers” (Cather). While he still lives a well off life, but still craves for more. These greedy ways about him can be explained by his disorderly personality. When Paul finally arrives home, we uncover new information about Paul. Cather states how Paul had a fear of rats and didn’t like the basement of his home, but to avoid confrontation from his father, Paul chooses to sleep down there. This shows the strong feelings he must have towards his father. However, to the reader, it doesn’t seem like Paul’s father has many strong negative feelings towards Paul. It turns out Paul’s father really wishes the absolute best for Paul, this is reflected later on as well. The following evening, Paul heads over to the theater, to hang out with a friend named Charley, who comes off as maybe more than a friend. Cather describes their relationship as, “For more than a year Paul had spent every available moment loitering about Charley Edwards’s dressing-room…the young actor, who could not afford to employ a dresser” (Cather). Willa Cather also goes on to mention that theater was Paul’s infatuation, but she mentions it in such a way that may suggest something more about Charley, “This was Paul’s fairy tale, and it had for him all the allurement of a secret love” (Cather). This statement seems to imply that Paul may have been homosexual. His feelings towards Charley, his feelings towards his father, and the death of his mother point towards the possibility of an unresolved Oedipus Complex. The Oedipus Complex, a theory by Sigmund Freud, suggests that during a child’s development it is important to have a “…desire for sexual involvement with the parent of the opposite sex and a concomitant sense of rivalry with the parent of the same sex” (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica). This is important because it helps mold the personality of a child. When the child eventually subconsciously realizes they can’t be with the parent of the opposite sex, they take qualities from the parent of the same sex to try and be more like them, hoping to find someone similar to them. In Paul’s case, he only had his father for his entire life. If this process by Freud is so crucial to sexual development and molding one’s personality, Paul failed to complete it, leaving it unresolved. This could have resulted in him only being subconsciously attracted to his father, developing a more homosexual personality. Being homosexual could have majorly contributed to Paul’s issues considering the time period and the likeliness of being accepted for what he was by society and his father. These ideas are further proven later in the story when Paul meets another boy. This possible unresolved Oedipus Complex and Narcissistic Personality Disorder could be contributors to Paul’s case. These contributors later have a strong impact of Paul’s fate. Throughout “Paul’s Case”, Paul seems to lose himself and grow more distant as we approach the ending. Paul’s symptoms of Narcissistic Personality Disorder grow as he grows fonder of Charley. Paul begins bragging at school about how close he is with the theater and different actors; a symptom of NPD is, “…exaggerating your achievements and talents” (Mayo Clinic). It becomes alarming for the school and Paul’s father. Eventually, Paul’s father pulls him out of school, and makes him quit from working at the theater. On top of taking away his dream job, he doesn’t allow him to see Charley anymore. Paul’s father didn’t do this to hurt Paul, he actually did this for Paul’s benefit. Following these events, Paul takes an overnight train to New York City. This trip was planned out to every detail, right down to the fresh flowers in his hotel room, “He had gone over every detail of it with Charley Edwards, and in his scrap-book at home there were pages of description about New York hotels, cut from the Sunday papers” (Cather). Upon arrival, Paul is in touch yet again with his NPD. Before Paul departed to New York, he was working somewhere new, he was asked to make a deposit at a bank, but he kept the majority of the money. Now that he is in New York, he decides to live his life the way he has always dreamt to. Paul goes to stores and purchases the best clothes and shoes, and checks into the Waldorf. He lives these few days like he believed he should have lived his whole life. He spends a night watching the orchestra at the hotel, he felt he truly belonged there. The next night, Paul encounters a new boy, this new boy is a Yale student. Paul’s experience with this boy is not detailed or explained much at all, but Cather suggests that Paul and the Yale student had some kind of sexual relations the night they met. “…The two boys went out together after dinner, not returning to the hotel until seven o’clock the next morning…The freshman pulled himself together to make his train and Paul went to bed” (Cather). This is another example of Paul’s unresolved Oedipus Complex, and his homosexuality. Not long after, Paul’s theft has made its way to the newspaper. When Paul reads, he discovers his father paid the money back and was on his way to get him. Paul then thinks about what would be to come, his old street, and the simplicity of life back home, “Until now, he could not remember the time when he had not been dreading something” (Cather). When his last day arrived, he realized what it was he lived for, “…he knew now, more than ever, that money was everything, the wall that stood between all he loathed and all he wanted” (Cather). After this realization, Paul decides to head towards the train, not to go back home, but to jump before the oncoming train. That is exactly what he does. At this point, it’s clear to the reader that Paul was planning this trip to have a final great experience.

In “Paul’s Case”, the protagonist, Paul, has a traumatic life. He inhabits Narcissistic Personality Disorder and an unresolved Oedipus Complex. He also had a series of bad experiences and felt his calling in life was something he would never achieve. Paul also was not appreciative of much and didn’t have a positive outlook on life or society itself. Paul’s case is he felt like he didn’t belong where he was and needed more money to get there.

Works Cited

Cather, Willa “Paul’s Case” 1905 Print

Mayo Clinic “Narcissistic Personality Disorder” November 8, 2014 Website

The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica “Oedipus Complex” Website

Cather’s Connection to “Paul’s Case”

To understand art, one must first understand the artist who created it and their motivation in doing so. In Willa Cather’s short story “Paul’s Case: A Study in Temperance” the protagonist, Paul, is a unique and complex character, which gives insight into the complexity of his creator. Understanding Cather’s personality and her purpose in the creation of Paul is paramount in the analysis of Paul as a character.The story of “Paul’s Case” was not wistfully imagined with the inclination to tell a pleasant story of light-hearted entertainment; the immaculate conception of the character Paul and his corresponding case is one of forced emotional expression under the pressures of a society that renounces those who with homosexual tendencies and the isolation that accompanies the concealing of such a secret. As scholar Marilee Lindemann states, “Cather’s fiction is clearly and deeply marked by medical and juridical discourse that pathologies nonprocreative sexualities; often, instead of being subverted or critiqued, those discourses are brutally enforced, even by those who are most oppressed by them”. It wasn’t that Cather was elated to share the story of a young dainty boy who “was tall for his age and very thin, with high, cramped shoulders and a narrow chest… and a red carnation in his buttonhole” (Cather) but rather she was using writing as an escaped her own emotional struggles, with “Paul’s Case” being the accumulation of those thoughts and feelings when channeled as written word.Paul is not only the protagonist but the manifestation of Cather’s own homosexuality. Paul is the opposite of the archetypical man. He isn’t interested in sports or chasing women, his main interests seem to be fashion and working “evening[s] as an usher at Carnegie Hall… where there were some of Raffelli’s gay studies of Paris streets and an airy blue Venetian scene or two that always exhilarated him” (Cather). Paul has to share a dressing room with a half dozen other boys and unlike most high school aged males in a changing room, Paul “was always considerably excited while be dressed… and he teased and plagued the boys until, telling him that he was crazy, they put him down on the floor and sat on him,” which made Paul feel “Somewhat calmed by his suppression” (Cather). Paul’s overt feminine disposition is counter to the expectations and ideals of the role of males in society. This phenomenon of crossing gender norms held a constant presence in Cather’s own life, who for a time “dressed as a boy, cut her hair like a man’s and called herself William Cather” (Rose).Understanding Cather is only the foundation in understanding Paul. Paul’s creation is not entirely encompassed in the superficial exploration of his outward appearance and inward traits; the environment in which Cather chose to place Paul as well as the story she wove around him opens a window of insight into Paul’s meaning as a character.The culminating even of “Paul’s Case” gives the critical understanding of Paul’s identity in the story as well as Cather’s influence. In the end Paul takes off the red carnation, now wilted, that has symbolized his resilience throughout the novel: “It occurred to him that all the flowers he had seen in the glass cases that first night must have gone the same way, long before this. It was only one splendid breath they had, in spite of their brave mockery at the winter outside the glass” (Cather). The “one splendid breath” of the flowers parallels the tribulations taken on by Paul enjoy the slender of the life he thought he deserved and the subsequent death of his spirit after the last breath of life left that dream and “all the world became Cordelia Street” (Cather). Paul gets to the train tracks and takes a nap. He chose not to shoot himself but jump in front of a train. These two actions are very significant. Paul wants to give himself an out, to have hope, to have an epiphany that makes him realize he doesn’t have to do what he feeling is the only option. He has to die because society won’t let him live and thrive. He isn’t shooting himself, the train is killing him; he is not responsible for his death, society is. Understanding Paul’s thought process calls for one to look deeper – to look into Cather’s mind. She did not leave the story to end with any socio-political resolution for Paul. For Cather there is no happy ending, only a society that is adamantly outspoken against homosexuals and leaves no hope for understanding or acceptance. She understands that “it [is] a losing game in the end, it seemed, this revolt against the homilies by which the world is run” (Cather). Paul has a multitude of things that make him a unique character and pose difficulties for anyone to attempt to analyze. To obtain a firm grasp on Paul as a character one must reach down between the words, through the subtext and touch the author themselves for that is where the truth lies. One cannot fully appreciate the art without first appreciating the struggles of the artist that manifested itself into their work.Works CitedLindemann, Marilee. Willa Cather Queering America. New York: Columbia UP, 1893. Print.Cather, Willa. “Paul’s Case.” By Willa Cather. Jalic Inc., 23 Apr. 2000. Web. 25 Sept. 2012. .Rose, Phyllis. “The Point of View Was Masculine.” The New York Times 11 Sept. 1983: n. pag. Web. .

Delusions of Grandeur

The short story Paul’s Case follows the character Paul through his exploits in his short-lived life. Paul is introduced as a rather troubled young man as demonstrated by the dynamic between him and his teachers. He is infatuated with artistry especially in the theater and even works at Carnegie Hall in Pittsburgh which gives him the opportunity to indulge his fixations. However, he has a naïve idea of art and only appreciates it for the grandiose sense of belonging rather than the artistry. Paul dislikes his middle-class life and looks down upon the businessmen, teachers, and families in his community. He holds himself in high regard and believes he will lead a cultured and prosperous life with great wealth. He pursues adventures that he hopes will grant him the unrealistic fantasies he has of his future life. Paul is a depressed young man who is superficial, delusional, and self-obsessed which is illustrated by his dissatisfaction with his current life and yearning for a better life which is out of his reach.

Paul is evidently superficial and delusional through his obsession with wealth, hatred of the middle-class life, and the desire for the good life. He describes his state of living as unfortunate and miserable; he believes he was meant to be rich and it was a sheer mistake that he was born in a poor household. He looks down upon the life his father and their neighbors lead; he describes them as unsophisticated, reverent and miserable. Paul obsesses about the lives of the iron magnates but does not yearn for the lives of “cash boys’ who work hard to achieve success. He feels alienated and drowning in ugliness by being in the middle-class life, only when he goes to the theater that he feels the ugliness leave him. He fantasizes about the easy life but he lacks the ambition and drive to achieve these accomplishments, he only hopes to be in the adventures of actors and artists but not work to be an artist himself. Paul’s obsession and superficiality drive him to steal $1000 from his new job to fund his exploits in New York City; he splurges on expensive apparels, a room at an elegant hotel and the high social life to feel the contentment he has always yearned for his whole life.

Paul’s fixation on wealth and power is illustrated in his obsession with art, the theater, and the lives of artists. After a concert, he follows the soloist to her hotel and imagines her life. He envisions the marble floors, lights, exotic meals and expensive wine; he then compares the high life with his room which he considers ugly and miserable. Paul uses his fascination with the art world to escape from his dull life and busk in the glow of sophistication. He believes that riches is the only way out of his current life, but he is deluded, as he does not understand the concept of money and hard work. Paul is always unimpressed by the lives of the hard-working people in his community; he does not consider a hardworking man, married with children as a success.

Paul’s narcissistic and self-obsessed nature is demonstrated comprehensively in the story through his attitude towards others and his delusional sense of self-importance. He regards his teachers unworldly and believes he has a better understanding of taste that they do, he thinks this of everyone except for the artists he looks up to. He is disgusted by the scents and filth in his home that he douses himself with cologne to rid himself of the smell before he visits Charley Edwards. Paul’s dire need for admiration leads him to lie about the adventures he goes to with the actors, and on how he treats the women to expensive hotels and gifts. The idea of returning to his old middle-class life weighs on him that he chooses to commit suicide to avoid subjecting himself to the mediocrity. Paul’s ignorance of how much his narcissism surpasses his ability to match the expectations he has set for himself leads to his demise.

The protagonist is presented as a victim of grandiose delusions or megalomania, a disorder which is mostly prevalent among young people. Paul exhibits symptoms such as self-perception of being superior, obsessing on fantasies of success and power, sense of entitlement, exploitative and arrogant demeanor. Due to his feelings of inferiority he compensates through crafting illusions of superiority. His enthrallment with the art world is a form of elitist narcissism which comes with lacking the concept of hard work. Furthermore, self-indulgence is a common indication exhibited through his splurging. The mismatch between his narcissism and the reality of his life results in depression which in turn makes him suicidal.